2013
DOI: 10.1002/2013ja018965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between auroral substorm and ion upflow in the nightside polar ionosphere

Abstract: [1] We investigated ionospheric ion upflow during an auroral substorm using simultaneous European Incoherent Scatter radar and IMAGE satellite data. Approximately 6 min after an initial brightening identified with data from the IMAGE wideband imaging camera instrument, ion upflow was seen and the electron temperature became enhanced, too. The ion upflow, with a velocity of about 150 m/s, and the electron temperature enhancement lasted for about 25 min. During the poleward expansion phase, surges of large upwar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upflows would be mainly caused by frictional heating in the F region ionosphere near the poleward edge of auroral oval. The case study by Ogawa et al (2013) clearly shows such large upflows at the northward edge of aurora during the poleward expansion of auroral substorm. This study indicates that upward flux at this latitude becomes significant in nighttime during the first day of storms, although its velocity becomes small on average.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Space Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upflows would be mainly caused by frictional heating in the F region ionosphere near the poleward edge of auroral oval. The case study by Ogawa et al (2013) clearly shows such large upflows at the northward edge of aurora during the poleward expansion of auroral substorm. This study indicates that upward flux at this latitude becomes significant in nighttime during the first day of storms, although its velocity becomes small on average.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Space Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the polar ionosphere, ion upflow is frequently seen during auroral substorm (e.g., Ogawa et al, ), which is most likely associated with the ion outflow measured in the bottomside magnetosphere (Wilson et al, ). A typical duration of a substorm is about a few hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In subsequent years the existence of multi-ion plasmas has been confirmed by various satellite (e.g. Viking, Freja, IMAGE) observations [4]. The F-layer of the terrestrial ionosphere which consists of various gases such as N , 2 O , 2 and atomic oxygen undergoes ionization due to ultraviolet radiation emanating from the Sun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(2009) found that ion outflow is delayed by several minutes from storm time substorms; and Ogawa et al. (2013) reported that ion upflow occurs about 6 min after the auroral initial brightening. From these assumptions, the test O + ions are released at t delay after 05:24 UT, where t delay is expressed as tdelay[min]=10[min/hr]×|MLTj[hr]23.8[hr]|+10[min/L]×()Li5.0+3[min]. ${t}_{\text{delay}}[\mathrm{min}]=10[\mathrm{min}\text{/hr}]\times \vert {\text{MLT}}_{j}[\mathrm{hr}]-23.8[\mathrm{hr}]\vert +10[\mathrm{min}/L]\times \left({L}_{i}-5.0\right)+3[\mathrm{min}].$ Therefore, t delay ranges from 3 min at ( L , MLT) = (5.0, 23.8 hr) to 15 min at ( L , MLT) = (5.4, 23.0 hr) and (5.4, 0.6 hr), indicating that the release time of O + ions is between 05:27 UT and 05:39 UT.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations For Trajectories Of Faleomentioning
confidence: 99%