1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(96)80059-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between calcifying tendinitis and subacromial impingement: A prospective radiography and magnetic resonance imaging study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Furthermore, only 16% of these patients had a type III acromion. The authors concluded that there was no correlation between ''calcifying tendonitis and osseous subacromial impingement'' and that subacromial decompression was not indicated in the treatment of patients with calcific deposits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Furthermore, only 16% of these patients had a type III acromion. The authors concluded that there was no correlation between ''calcifying tendonitis and osseous subacromial impingement'' and that subacromial decompression was not indicated in the treatment of patients with calcific deposits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As yet there are no firm views as to the benefit of endoscopic operations, 25 but additional subacromial decompression does not seem to be indicated. 26 Graff 13 was the first to analyse the effects of shock waves on muscles and tendons in dogs. After high-energy treatment he noted intra-and perimuscular haematomas and described the formation of metaplastic chondroid tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcific deposits are commonly confined to a single tendon, with the supraspinatus having a reported incidence as high as 63%. 5 However, analysis of either plain radiographs or MRIs has verified the presence of multiple calcific deposits affecting more than 1 tendon, with the supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons being jointly affected in 20% of cases. 5 Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to differentiate myositis ossificans from calcific tendonitis easily, because it has a high (bright) signal on the T1-weighted image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 However, analysis of either plain radiographs or MRIs has verified the presence of multiple calcific deposits affecting more than 1 tendon, with the supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons being jointly affected in 20% of cases. 5 Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to differentiate myositis ossificans from calcific tendonitis easily, because it has a high (bright) signal on the T1-weighted image. 9 A calcific deposit would have a low (black) signal throughout the deposit, with no central hyperintensity on T1-or T2-weighted images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%