2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11119-012-9277-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between cotton yield and soil electrical conductivity, topography, and Landsat imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
43
1
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
43
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The same results were obtained for the comparison between PL/PR and G/NDVI and inversely with MSI. Guo et al (2012) obtained similar results for the comparison of PL/PR with cotton yield and four bands in a Landsat 5 TM image. The types of curvature (Figure 2) indicate the directions of soil water and nutrient movement.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The same results were obtained for the comparison between PL/PR and G/NDVI and inversely with MSI. Guo et al (2012) obtained similar results for the comparison of PL/PR with cotton yield and four bands in a Landsat 5 TM image. The types of curvature (Figure 2) indicate the directions of soil water and nutrient movement.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Theoretically, a concave area should provide more available water and nutrients supporting plant growth. In this study with oat and winter wheat and in another study by Guo et al (2012) with cotton, yield was positively correlated with PR, which means that yield was higher at the convex curvature locations. Kaspar et al (2003) stated that maize yield was negatively correlated with both curvatures, especially in dry seasons.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations