2022
DOI: 10.31455/asya.1012952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Between Early Maladaptive Schemas and Psychological Resilience

Abstract: Early maladaptive schemas are defined as structures or patterns that develop throughout childhood and adolescence, consist of memories, cognitions, senses, and physical sensations, are dysfunctional, hurt an individual's self-perception and interpersonal relationships, and emerge throughout life (Young et al., 2003). It's also defined as a person's ability to overcome challenges, problems, uncertainties, and a variety of other adversities while still succeeding. The maladaptive schemas that an individual devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have reported that early maladaptive schemas are associated with psychological resilience and an increase in these schemas is linked to a decrease in resilience. 31,32 The inverse relationship between codependency and psychological resilience obtained as a finding of this study can also be explained by the role of early maladaptive schemas. However, more studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between codependency and psychological resilience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Studies have reported that early maladaptive schemas are associated with psychological resilience and an increase in these schemas is linked to a decrease in resilience. 31,32 The inverse relationship between codependency and psychological resilience obtained as a finding of this study can also be explained by the role of early maladaptive schemas. However, more studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between codependency and psychological resilience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%