2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-013-9763-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Hypoxia and Macrobenthic Production in Chesapeake Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the sample sizes were low in two of the data sets, it is important to understand how biomass and secondary production (a critical ecosystem function) respond. Results of this study generally agreed with other biomass studies (Ritter and Montagna, 1999;Seitz et al, 2009;Sturdivant et al, 2014). A mean biomass in the hypoxic areas of Narragansett Bay that is one-fifth to one-third that of the normoxic areas represents a dramatic reduction in potential food available for higher trophic levels such as fish.…”
Section: Biomass and Secondary Productionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While the sample sizes were low in two of the data sets, it is important to understand how biomass and secondary production (a critical ecosystem function) respond. Results of this study generally agreed with other biomass studies (Ritter and Montagna, 1999;Seitz et al, 2009;Sturdivant et al, 2014). A mean biomass in the hypoxic areas of Narragansett Bay that is one-fifth to one-third that of the normoxic areas represents a dramatic reduction in potential food available for higher trophic levels such as fish.…”
Section: Biomass and Secondary Productionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Despite the frequent summer hypoxia, the Schult (2010) station in the hypoxic area near Conimicut Point had high quahog densities because this species can tolerate some hypoxia (Altieri and Witman, 2006). Like Sturdivant et al (2014), we removed quahogs from both the Schult and McKinney data prior to the t-test.…”
Section: Biomass and Secondary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations