2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between in vitro and in vivo methane production measured simultaneously with different dietary starch sources and starch levels in dairy cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…microbial composition) may explain differences in the efficacy of additives. Hatew et al (2015) provided further evidence on the importance of diet fed to the donor animal. Experiments involved the incubation of the same substrate (grass silage or beet pulp) with rumen inoculum obtained from donor cows fed on diets that differed in starch source (native vs. gelatinized maize grain) and starch level (270 vs 530 g/kg concentrate DM).…”
Section: Donor Animal Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…microbial composition) may explain differences in the efficacy of additives. Hatew et al (2015) provided further evidence on the importance of diet fed to the donor animal. Experiments involved the incubation of the same substrate (grass silage or beet pulp) with rumen inoculum obtained from donor cows fed on diets that differed in starch source (native vs. gelatinized maize grain) and starch level (270 vs 530 g/kg concentrate DM).…”
Section: Donor Animal Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Hatew et al (2015) reported a study comparing measurements of CH 4 production in vitro and in vivo, and those were conducted simultaneously (animals adapted to the same substrate as incubated in bottles were used as a source of rumen inocula for 72 h in vitro incubations). Measurements of CH 4 production for 24 h in vitro (expressed per unit of OM incubated) were found to be moderately correlated (R 2 = 0.54; P = 0.04, 4 diets and 16 animals used) with in vivo CH 4 production (when expressed per unit of estimated rumen-fermentable OM) across a range of diets differing in source and amount of starch in dietary concentrates.…”
Section: In Vitro Versus In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not observe SBO concentration and forage species interaction, and this was probably because of the absence of concentrate in the diets. Besides concentrate diet characteristics, differences between our donor cows' diets and the composition of evaluated forages can lead to alterations in in vitro CH 4 production(Hatew et al, 2015). The same authors observed variable in vitro CH 4 production for different substrates interacting with inoculums from donor cows fed different starch characteristics, and this can be more relevant when evaluating solely forage diets.4.6 | In vitro potentially digestible neutral detergent fibre digestibilityFat supplementation has a known effect of decreasing rumen populations of fibrinolytic bacteria and protozoa and activity of fibredegrading enzymes…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of in vitro gas production (GP) is largely used to evaluate the nutritive value of ruminant feeds by incubating substrate in buffered rumen fluid (Cone, Van Gelder, Visscher, & Oudshoorn, 1996;Dijkstra, Kebreab, Bannink, France, & Lopez, 2005;Getachew, Blümmel, Makkar, & Becker, 1998). This in vitro approach can also be used to evaluate different feeding strategies for their potential to mitigate CH 4 production (Hatew et al, 2015;Holtshausen et al, 2012;Pellikaan et al, 2011). There is a lack of studies reporting in vivo CH 4 production by cattle upon changes in the maturity of a grass silage at harvest (Randby, Weisbjerg, Nørgaard, & Heringstad, 2012;Warner, Bannink, Hatew, Van Laar, & Dijkstra, 2017), and there is a dearth of direct in vitro-in vivo comparisons with respect to CH 4 production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%