2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0272263105050254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEXICAL COMPETENCE AND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY: Variable Sensitivity

Abstract: The purpose of the present study was to determine what features associated with the macrolevel of lexical competence vary as a function of an increase in second language (L2) proficiency. The macrolevel of participants' word knowledge was described with respect to six variables that are commonly associated with three proposed macrolevel dimensions, namely quantity, quality, and metacognitive awareness. Sixty-four participants (native speakers of English, L2 advanced learners, and intermediate learners of Engli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
115
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
115
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Vocabulary knowledge has been shown to be a good predictor of overall L2 proficiency (Beglar and Hunt 1999;Zareva et al 2005). Moreover, the vocabulary test currently used has been shown to be a strong predictor of overall speaking proficiency.…”
Section: Materials: Vocabulary Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vocabulary knowledge has been shown to be a good predictor of overall L2 proficiency (Beglar and Hunt 1999;Zareva et al 2005). Moreover, the vocabulary test currently used has been shown to be a strong predictor of overall speaking proficiency.…”
Section: Materials: Vocabulary Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that address measures of lexical richness (e. g. lexical variation, lexical frequency) typically focus on relating these to writing quality and proficiency levels (e. g. Laufer and Nation 1995;Jarvis 2002;Malvern and Richards 2002;Zareva et al 2005). Few studies have compared lexical richness in learners of different age with similar proficiency levels.…”
Section: Age and Vocabulary Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the aspects of knowing a word can be academically described, designing a test for measuring multiple traits of words, such as forms, positions, functions, and meaning, tend to be unfeasible (Zareva, Schwanenflugel, & Nikolova, 2005). Some frequently used models for measuring vocabulary knowledge focus on two dimensions -the size and the quality (Nation, 2001;Richards, 1976).…”
Section: Measuring Idiomatic Competencementioning
confidence: 99%