In this review we have summarized the basic principles that govern the relationships between thermal exposure (Temperature and time of exposure) and thermal damage, with an emphasis on normal tissue effects. We have also attempted to identify specific thermal dose information (for safety and injury) for a variety of tissues in a variety of species. We address the use, accuracy and difficulty of conversion of an individual time and temperature (thermal doses) to a standardized value (eg equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C) for comparison of thermal treatments. Although, the conversion algorithm appears to work well within a range of moderately elevated temperatures (2-15 deg C) above normal physiologic baseline (37-39 deg C) there is concern that conversion accuracy does not hold up for temperatures which are minimally or significantly above baseline. An extensive review of the literature suggests a comprehensive assessment of the "thermal doesto-tissue effect" has not previously been assembled for most individual tissues and never been viewed in a semi-comprehensive (tissues and species) manner.Finally, we have addressed the relationship of thermal does-to-effect vs. baseline temperature. This issues is important since much of the thermal dose-to-effect information has been accrued in animal models with baseline temperatures 1-2 deg higher than that of humans.
INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this review is to present basic concepts relating thermal dose (time at temperature) to cell killing and tissue damage.
© 2003 SPIE
HHS Public Access
Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript
Author ManuscriptThis review summarizes the basic principles that govern the relationships between thermal exposure (temperature and time of exposure) and thermal damage, with an emphasis on normal tissue effects. Methods for converting one time-temperature combination to a time at a standardized temperature (cumulative minutes at 43° / CEM) are provided as well as some discussion about the underlying assumptions that go into these calculations. There are few in vivo papers, examining the type and extent of damage that occurs in the lower temperature range for hypothermic exposures (e.g. 39-42°C). Although not specifically calculated, the authors believe the CEM analysis for estimating an equivalent thermal does not retain a high degree of accuracy when temperatures above 55°C or so. Therefore it is appears that estimation of thermal dose to effect at low (temperatures a few degree above baseline body temperature) and high temperatures are more difficult to assesses and quantify. It is also apparent from this review that an extremely large variation in the type and the quality of tissue damage endpoint assessment significantly affects the ability to accurately compared study results.The authors have assembled a detailed review of thermal thresholds for tissue damage in the majority of organs (based on what is detectable in vivo). The data are normalized using thermal dosimeter concepts. This database is available by reques...