2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12239968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Panic Buying and Per Capita Income during COVID-19

Abstract: Panic buying and hoarding express common human behavior in times of crisis. Early in COVID-19, as the pandemic crisis intensified, toilet paper was one of the emblematic cases of panic buying. Using a Geographic Information System (GIS) to cross official per capita income data and real toilet paper transactions obtained from groceries spread around the city of São Paulo (Brazil), this study compares sales levels during the period in which panic purchases took place to the sales levels off that period. As expec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, consumers with higher household income are also expected to engage more in panic buying behavior because of their larger purchasing power which allows them to spend more on each shopping trip compared to consumers with lower household income limited by their lower purchasing power. This expectation is aligned with Yoshizaki’s finding that panic buying is more prevalent among the more affluent people, albeit panic buying does not grow linearly with income but follows a concave function with a diminishing slope [ 132 ]. However, this is not the case in this survey.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Additionally, consumers with higher household income are also expected to engage more in panic buying behavior because of their larger purchasing power which allows them to spend more on each shopping trip compared to consumers with lower household income limited by their lower purchasing power. This expectation is aligned with Yoshizaki’s finding that panic buying is more prevalent among the more affluent people, albeit panic buying does not grow linearly with income but follows a concave function with a diminishing slope [ 132 ]. However, this is not the case in this survey.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This trend was partially driven by the media, which often showed pictures of empty shelves and warned of food shortages [84]. It also affected people from all income classes, including lower-income populations [85].…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct impacts include people infected by COVID-19, as they have to expend time and resources for their recovery. Indirect impacts arise from the changes in the operations, with the economies contracting themselves as a consequence of the pandemic; therefore, consumption, production, and thus the livelihoods of people are affected [8,34]. Human suffering rises [12] because, in most economies, supply could not respond to rising demands regarding health care services (hospitalization and intensive care units), key health care goods (oxygen and automatic respirators), and social aid (because with lockdowns, unemployment causes hunger and raises the incidence of poverty).…”
Section: A Humanitarian Logistics Framework For Pandemic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%