Relationship between the levels of abscisic acid in latent buds, in leaves and in internodes of &lt;em&gt;Vitis vinifera&lt;/em&gt; L. cv. Merlot during the dormancy phase

Koussa, Tayeb; Zaoui, Driss; Broquedis, Michel

doi:10.20870/oeno-one.1998.32.4.1712

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Corresponding data on poplar buds reveal that with increasing levels of ABA, the regulators of ABA biosynthesis and ABA signal transduction components were also positively modulated [13,15,16]. Accordingly, a decrease in endogenous ABA level also preceded the consequent release of bud dormancy in birch, grapevine, and potatoes [1,[17][18][19][20]. In potato, the diminishing ABA content throughout the dormancy cycle was correlated with a decreased expression of NCED [21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Abscisic Acid Related Metabolites in Sweet Cherry Buds (Prunus avium L.)

Fm¹,

Baldermann²,

Kp³

et al. 2018

J Hortic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Abscisic Acid Related Metabolites in Sweet Cherry Buds (Prunus avium L.)

Fm¹,

Baldermann²,

Kp³

et al. 2018

J Hortic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Nevertheless, plant tissues can be extremely sensitive to minor alterations in water potential (Levitt, 1980). Much evidence supports a relationship between ABA concentration and bud water content under either short-day or water stress-induced dormancy in Betula pubescens (Rinne et al, 1994(Rinne et al, a, 1994bWelling et al, 1997) and Vitis vinifera 'Merlot Noir (Koussa et al, 1998). Depth of dormancy has been proposed to be related to endogenous levels of ABA (Tamura et al, 1993) and the water status of the bud.…”

Section: Bud Dormancy Inductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Induction and Release of Bud Dormancy in Woody Perennials: A Science Comes of Age

Arora¹,

Rowland²,

Tanino³

2003

HortSci

306

208

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The path to dormancy induction, maintenance, and release is a continuum and has been the topic of thousands of research articles to date. It would be an impossible task and indeed presumptuous of us to imagine that we could review all the research conducted on dormancy in the past century in this article. The multiple and complex nature of the dormancy phenomenon would require not one review but a series of in-depth reviews to cover the research on individual subdisciplines that come under the umbrella of dormancy. Its complexity and multiplicity of various subdisciplines stem from the fact that dormancy affects diverse plant structures (buds, seeds, bulbs, etc.) distinctly and that these dormant structures maintain distinct anatomical and physiological relations with neighboring parts. We, therefore, have chosen to discuss here only one, nevertheless highly significant, aspect of dormancy, i.e., bud dormancy in woody plants.As one reflects over nearly a century of work, it is apparent that, as with other disciplines, dormancy research has evolved as different aspects of bud dormancy (e.g., site of dormancy; photoperiod and environmental induction of dormancy; physiology of dormancy control, particularly phytohormones; chilling requirement-effective temperatures, bud differences, modification of chilling requirement by environment and/or cultural practices, models for calculating chilling requirement; dormancy-breaking chemicals and/or stress treatments) catching the fancy of horticulturists at different periods on the temporal curve of dormancy research. This research was extensively reviewed during the ), followed by more recent reviews and workshop proceedings in the among others). To appreciate the continuity of significant research developments in this field, we recommend them as a must-read for students of plant dormancy.Although many significant mileposts have been reached in our understanding of the induction and release of bud dormancy in the past 50 to 60 years (reviewed in the above citations), research published up until the 1980s includes little information on experimental systems and approaches for studying the genetics of bud dormancy and the cellular and molecular events-gene expression and regulation, signaling mechanism(s), or mechanistic aspects-associated with regulation of bud dormancy. Many of us must wonder how H. Muller-Thurgau had already confirmed in 1885 that a shortened growth period of the shoots caused by water stress promotes early inception of bud dormancy and shortens its duration, i.e., reduces the chilling requirement. This observation was further supported by Chandler and Tufts in 1934 based on their observation that an extended growth period of shoots delays budbreak the following spring if there is insufficient chilling. Despite these early observations, today we still do not clearly understand the cellular biology of how environmental stress regulates bud dormancy. dormancy induction and release in the past century has been, in part, due to the preoccupation with the linear ...

show abstract

“…Rouholahkarimi@gmail.com; R.Karimi@malayeru.ac.ir defenses against freezing stress (Salzman et al 1996;AitBarka and Audran 1997;Koussa et al 1998;Jones et al 1999;Kalberer et al 2006;Xiao et al 2006). Therefore, it is possible to use changes in these materials in plants exposed to LTS as substitute to evaluate cold hardiness in a range of grape germplasm resources (John et al 2010).…”

Section: And Rouhollah Karimimentioning

confidence: 99%

Role of exogenous abscisic acid in adapting of ‘Sultana’ grapevine to low-temperature stress

Karimi

Ahmad

2015

Acta Physiol Plant

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abscisic acid (ABA) has a key role in some plant species under low-temperature stress (LTS). In this study the effects of ABA at four concentrations (0, 50, 100 and 200 lL) on electrolyte leakage (EL), visual damage index, soluble carbohydrate, proline, total phenolic compound and relative water content (RWC) of leaves of 'Sultana' grapevines were studied under LTS (0, 4 and -4°C). Moreover, to further elucidate the efficiency of foliar ABA on freezing tolerance, some relevant morphophysiological changes were evaluated at three sampling dates: September, October and November. The increase in cane and leaf EL and the visible symptoms of leaf damage caused by LTS were minimized by the application of ABA. Moreover, in ABA-treated vines, specifically at 200 lM, the contents of soluble carbohydrate, proline and total phenolic increased and the RWC decreased. These alterations in ABA-induced metabolism alleviated the deleterious effects of LTS on 'Sultana' grapevine. Freezing tolerance of ABA-treated vines improved within each sampling date in autumn. Foliar application of ABA at 200 lM decreased LT50 in September, October and November by -2.6, -3.6 and -3.9°C, respectively, as compared to those of control vines. This study also demonstrated that ABA was effective in shoot growth inhibition, leaf abscission and periderm development, indicating that ABA treatments advanced cold acclimation in grapevines. Increased fall freezing tolerance induced by foliar ABA application may be beneficial in nurseries, new established vineyards and for late-bearing cultivars in regions with fall frost events.

show abstract

Relationship between the levels of abscisic acid in latent buds, in leaves and in internodes of <em>Vitis vinifera</em> L. cv. Merlot during the dormancy phase

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

Abscisic Acid Related Metabolites in Sweet Cherry Buds (Prunus avium L.)

Abscisic Acid Related Metabolites in Sweet Cherry Buds (Prunus avium L.)

Induction and Release of Bud Dormancy in Woody Perennials: A Science Comes of Age

Role of exogenous abscisic acid in adapting of ‘Sultana’ grapevine to low-temperature stress

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About