1980
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1980.51.3.795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Bender Memory to Achievement in Arithmetic by First Graders

Abstract: At the end of first grade arithmetic and reading achievement scores of 84 children were correlated with power and precision of Bender Memory using the Bender Visual Memory Technique. Of the 20 correlations, 16 were significant. Support for recommended use of the Bender Visual Memory Technique as a clinical or diagnostic screening instrument for early assessment of arithmetic skill is provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arter and Jenkins (1979) question the entire diagnostic testing-prescriptive teaching model in which deficits on such measures are assumed to be related to deficits in academic achievement. Despite claims of correlational evidence for the relationship between these measures and indices of academic achievement (Beery, 1967;Koppitz, 1964Koppitz, , 1975Snyder, Massong, & Ashmore, 1980), Arter and Jenkins (1979) argue that "mere statistical significance is not evidence for validity." They recommend a criterion established by Guilford (1956) that a correlation coefficient of .35 be considered as a minimum cutoff for criterion validity, and that, where appropriate, extraneous variables such as intelligence be controlled for to avoid spuriously inflated correlations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arter and Jenkins (1979) question the entire diagnostic testing-prescriptive teaching model in which deficits on such measures are assumed to be related to deficits in academic achievement. Despite claims of correlational evidence for the relationship between these measures and indices of academic achievement (Beery, 1967;Koppitz, 1964Koppitz, , 1975Snyder, Massong, & Ashmore, 1980), Arter and Jenkins (1979) argue that "mere statistical significance is not evidence for validity." They recommend a criterion established by Guilford (1956) that a correlation coefficient of .35 be considered as a minimum cutoff for criterion validity, and that, where appropriate, extraneous variables such as intelligence be controlled for to avoid spuriously inflated correlations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%