1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0734-242x(05)80026-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of microbial mass and activity in biodegradation of solid waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(g dry wt.) 31 of cellulolytic bacteria at di¡erent depths of the land¢ll site of Aveley (Essex, UK) and by Palmisano et al [11] who did not detect any cellulolytic bacteria in Fresh Kill Land¢ll (New York, USA). In these previous studies, cellulolytic bacteria were numerated by inoculating the refuse extract directly on cellulose-containing medium and incubating plates under anaerobic condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(g dry wt.) 31 of cellulolytic bacteria at di¡erent depths of the land¢ll site of Aveley (Essex, UK) and by Palmisano et al [11] who did not detect any cellulolytic bacteria in Fresh Kill Land¢ll (New York, USA). In these previous studies, cellulolytic bacteria were numerated by inoculating the refuse extract directly on cellulose-containing medium and incubating plates under anaerobic condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Microbial degradation of cellulose appears as an important metabolic activity in land¢ll where cellulose and hemicellulose are considered to represent 91% of the methane potential of fresh refuse according to Barlaz et al [29]. Previous studies which concerned cellulolytic bacteria of land¢ll have focused only on counting bacteria [8,10^11] or on measuring global cellulolytic activity [7,10,30,31]. To our knowledge, phenotypic studies of cellulolytic bacteria of MSW have been restricted to the identi¢cation of one strain of Cellulomonas [12] and to the characterization of nine anaerobic cellulolytic bacterial isolates [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of the most common methods for characterizing the quality of compost during processing include an analysis of caloric content, carbon content, and biological oxygen demand [8,35,36]. A diversity of methods also exist for monitoring the progression of polysaccharide degradation including chemical quantification of different polysaccharides, assays of cellulolytic and amylolytic activities in the waste stream, isotopic tracking of labeled organics, and NMR and NIR spectroscopy [5,6,32,[37][38][39]. Such methods offer a snapshot of the overall abundance of different materials in compost, and the biochemical dynamics of the process, but they provide insufficient information regarding the degree of decomposition relative to progression to an endpoint as decomposition is occurring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%