Relationships among levels of government support, marketing activities, and financial health of nonprofit performing arts organizations

Abstract

*This exploratory study researches and analyzes the empirical effects of financial levels of government support and marketing practices on the financial health of nonprofit performing arts organizations. Declining government subsidies and increasing competition from non-traditional sources have presented these organizations with unique opportunities and challenges that call for a market-centered, as well as an art-centered approach. Financial health is critical for the long-term success of a nonprofit performing arts organization. Few empirical studies have examined the interrelationships between these key variables. This study analyzes a sample of 63 American professional symphony orchestras employing 20 years of data. The correlations among financial levels of government support and marketing activities were positive and significant, the correlations among levels of government support and financial health were negative and significant, and the correlations between levels of marketing activity and financial health were negative and varied in significance. Causal analyses were less conclusive, but significant causal relationships were found for large symphony orchestras, indicating that segmentation research may be warranted. Implications and opportunities for future research are presented which have potential application for government agencies, academic researchers, and arts organization managers, boards of directors, and donors.

How cultural organizations’ size and funding influence innovation and performance: the case of museums

“…Studies addressing this issue may be grouped into two major blocks. The first group states that private funding leads to an increase in organizations' business orientation and is therefore likely to imply higher expenditure on visitor services, which will in turn entail more innovation, whereas public funding has a negative impact (Hughes and Luksetich 2004;Kirchner et al 2007). Interest in the second group focuses on evidencing that public funding may lead cultural organizations to increase investment in innovation, as a result of having to prove their efficiency in order to secure funding (McDonald and Harrison 2002;Rentschler and Wood 2001) and also because public funding may act as a cushion allowing firms to take more risks, thereby encouraging innovation.…”

Barriers to inter-organisational collaboration amongst performing arts organisations in South Africa

“…PAOs generally operate as not-for-profit enterprises (Kirchner et al 2007). They often cannot operate on earned income or ticket sales alone and as such rely on funding from numerous parties, including the government, private sponsors, donors as well as paying audience members (Hume et al 2007).…”

“…The industry battles to contain costs and for most companies ticket sales simply do not cover expenditure (Kirchner et al 2007). While this reality is appreciated, there is a sense from the interviews that some PAOs may not be as aggressive in looking for ways to market themselves, because they felt they were deserving of external support.…”

Financial Management in Religious Non-Profit Organizations: A Mission Based Approach to Ratio Analysis

“…Despite the gap, there are many tested financial performance measures in the NPOs literature 3 . Financial performance measures or financial health of RNPOs is important in making resource allocations decisions and further understanding of this financial health is crucial in achieving the long-term success and survival of these organizations 7 . For RNPOs, these financial measures or indicators are signals used to convey evidence that assessment of the desired missions are being achieved.…”