2008
DOI: 10.1177/0016986207311059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Among Private Speech and Creativity in Head Start and Low—Socioeconomic Status Preschool Children

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore Vygotsky's notion of private speech as a cognitive self-regulatory process and how it related to creativity measures among at-risk children. Thirty-two Head Start and state-funded Pre-K children completed the Torrance creativity test Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement (TCAM). The children's private speech was collected in an open play context and while children completed structured logical— mathematical activities. Results revealed that both originality and flue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Describing this shift answers our first research question and supports our hypothesis that features of the caregiving context in the toddler and preschool period would have significant influence on social-emotional competencies in 1st grade. In particular, the characteristics of support provided in the caregiving context, as measured via sensitivity and the HOME, have significant relationships with preschool language (a skill set that serves as a control for self and social regulation; Daugherty & White, 2008; Meissner, 2008; Mercer, 2008; Winsler, Fernyhough, & Montero, 2009) and protect against children’s inattention at 54 months of age. Inattention at 54 months was also significantly predicted by attachment at both earlier time points (15 and 36 months), and indirectly by sensitivity, via oppositional behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Describing this shift answers our first research question and supports our hypothesis that features of the caregiving context in the toddler and preschool period would have significant influence on social-emotional competencies in 1st grade. In particular, the characteristics of support provided in the caregiving context, as measured via sensitivity and the HOME, have significant relationships with preschool language (a skill set that serves as a control for self and social regulation; Daugherty & White, 2008; Meissner, 2008; Mercer, 2008; Winsler, Fernyhough, & Montero, 2009) and protect against children’s inattention at 54 months of age. Inattention at 54 months was also significantly predicted by attachment at both earlier time points (15 and 36 months), and indirectly by sensitivity, via oppositional behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results replicate findings that establish a relationship between child-rearing context and language skill and urge advocates, educators, and researchers to attend to language skill as important for more than literacy’s sake; much like Vygotsky’s (1962, 1987) work on the relationship between language and epistemology, our findings demonstrate that language is an organizing tool that aids children in regulating their internal experiences and their relationships adaptively. (For additional discussion of the role of language skills in social emotional development, see Daugherty & White, 2008; Meissner, 2008; Mercer, 2008; Winsler et al, 2009.) Parents and educators can be supported by interventions that encourage the use of language at home as more than an early literacy tool, but to use language at its most basic purpose—as a communication tool to express ourselves and share ideas within social contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde öncelikle tanılama ile ilgili güçlüklere rastlanmaktadır. Üstün yetenekli çocukların tanılanması oldukça güçtür ve tanılamaya yönelik yöntemlerin çoğu yeterince hassas olmama konusunda eleştirilmektedir (Daugherty ve White, 2008). Bu nedenle, üstün yetenekli çocukların bilişsel yeteneklerinin belirlenmesi için geçerli ve adil bir yöntem bulunmalıdır (Scott ve Delgado, 2005).…”
unclassified
“…In addition, the TCAM was never normed for 6-and 7-year-olds, so this research relied on raw data, and the scale was more conservative and did not allow children to choose a variety of responses, as explained previously. Nevertheless, despite its limitations, this instrument has been reliably used in recent research (e.g., Daugherty & White, 2008;Justo, 2008;Lloyd & Howe, 2003).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%