1987
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0661111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Between Dietary Protein, Dietary Energy, Rearing Environment, and Nutrient Utilization by Broiler Breeder Pullets

Abstract: The relationship between dietary energy and protein and their interaction with method of restriction and environment were studied. In Experiment 1, two isocaloric diets (2750 kcal/kg) formulated to contain either 13.5% or 15.5% protein were fed to broiler breeder pullets from hatching through 21 weeks of age. There were no significant differences in body weight due to dietary protein but chicks fed the 13.5% protein ration did require a significantly greater quantity of feed to produce an equivalent body weigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, they support the concept that BW alone, while still the best management tool available to the individual grower, is not a totally accurate predictor of reproductive preparedness. In other reports demonstrating the beneficial effect of increased protein intake during the prelay period, most of the observed improvements did not occur during the initial stages of production (Brake et al, 1985;Lilburn et al, 1987). This observation was partially the case in Experiment 2 as those pullets within both rearing treatments which consumed the HIGH-PRO diet from 18 to 24 wk had significantly improved production from 28 to 32 wk, whereas significant improvement (P<.05) was observed only for the HIGHPRO-HEAVY treatment from 24 to 28 wk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, they support the concept that BW alone, while still the best management tool available to the individual grower, is not a totally accurate predictor of reproductive preparedness. In other reports demonstrating the beneficial effect of increased protein intake during the prelay period, most of the observed improvements did not occur during the initial stages of production (Brake et al, 1985;Lilburn et al, 1987). This observation was partially the case in Experiment 2 as those pullets within both rearing treatments which consumed the HIGH-PRO diet from 18 to 24 wk had significantly improved production from 28 to 32 wk, whereas significant improvement (P<.05) was observed only for the HIGHPRO-HEAVY treatment from 24 to 28 wk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Within each feed treatment (LOW, MED, HIGH), however, the goal was to keep the LBW pullets at approximately 85% of the BW of the corresponding HBW birds through the onset of sexual maturity (24 wk) and then increase the percentage to 95% by 28 wk of age at which time all treatment groups received peak feed allow- ances. All birds were fed a commercial grower diet (Lilbum et al, 1987) until 22 wk of age at which time they were given a commercial breeder diet (Lilburn et al, 1987).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If energy or nutrients are limiting, birds can compensate by reducing egg size or the number of eggs laid, or by increasing the laying interval and spreading the cost of egg formation over a longer period. Young breeder fowls given diets containing different amounts of protein, for example, laid similar sized eggs but those given low-protein diets laid significantly fewer eggs (Lilburn et al, 1987). In ostriches, egg production was not affected in birds fed on diets containing between 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is within this range of dietary constraints in the starter and grower feeds that the question arises, can the diet influence skeletal development independent of any changes in the pattern of BW gain? Leeson and Summers (1984) and Lilburn et al (1987) reported that very low levels of dietary protein can significantly decrease shank length during the ad libitum starter period. Once chicks are fed a common diet or feed intake is restricted, however, these differences in shank length disappear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%