2016
DOI: 10.1149/2.1061603jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between PEMFC Cathode Kinetic Losses and Contaminants’ Dipole Moment and Adsorption Energy on Pt

Abstract: A database summarizing the effects of 21 contaminants on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) was used to examine relationships between cathode kinetic losses and contaminant physicochemical parameters. Impedance spectroscopy data were employed to obtain oxygen reduction kinetic resistances by fitting data in the 10−158 Hz range to a simplified equivalent circuit. The contaminant dipole moment and the adsorption energy of the contaminant on a Pt surface were chosen as parameters. Dip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the cathode side, a chemical air filter may be required to remove potential contaminants (SO x , H 2 S, NO x , volatile organic compounds, etc.) from intake air [111,112]. In addition to external contaminants, degradation products (sulfate and organic compounds from the membrane [66,[113][114][115]; cobalt from the catalyst [116,117]) from within the fuel cell MEA can also decrease fuel cell cathode performance.…”
Section: Durability Of Low-pt Fuel Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the cathode side, a chemical air filter may be required to remove potential contaminants (SO x , H 2 S, NO x , volatile organic compounds, etc.) from intake air [111,112]. In addition to external contaminants, degradation products (sulfate and organic compounds from the membrane [66,[113][114][115]; cobalt from the catalyst [116,117]) from within the fuel cell MEA can also decrease fuel cell cathode performance.…”
Section: Durability Of Low-pt Fuel Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 indicates that conversion is below 43 and 49% at 0.55 V for propene and methyl methacrylate, respectively. Therefore, for the lower cell voltages of 0.46 and 0.44 V, contaminant conversion is expected to be even lower than at 0.55 V. Table 1 data were obtained with similar MEAs (ohmic resistance of approximately 0.056 Ω•cm 2 at 1 A•cm −2 ), 49 which is comparable to an average of 0.064 Ω•cm 2 at 1 A•cm −2 for the present work (Section 3.2). The estimated cathode potentials from ref 48 and the present report data are similar because a hydrogen electrode was also used for both cases (anode potential of ∼0 V versus the RHE).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most contaminants are not fully oxidized at a 0.55 V cell voltage (Table ), which is in part supported by contaminant reduction and oxidation potentials . This situation ensures that a supply of unaltered contaminant is available for adsorption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of a correlation is not surprising, considering the effects of cell design and operating conditions on contamination. Several parameters were mentioned in an earlier attempt to correlate the effect of contaminants on oxygen reduction kinetics [65], including contaminant partial pressure and temperature, exposed Pt surface features (crystal faces, edges), Pt state (reduced or oxidized), phase in contact with the Pt surface (air, ionomer), adsorption isotherms for O 2 , contaminants, and related intermediates and products, and elementary chemical and electrochemical reactions and associated rate constants for O 2 reduction and contaminant oxidation or reduction. This list is enlarged by factors affecting ohmic and mass transfer losses, including cation and neutral molecules' absorption isotherms influencing ionomer and membrane ionic conductivity and oxygen permeability by swelling and changing the distance between sulfonate groups, and contaminant scavenging by liquid water modifying the effective contaminant concentration [12,13,[66][67][68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Contaminant Effect Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%