Relationships, cooperation and development in a Brazilian industrial cluster

Abstract

PurposeThe objective of this study is to analyse and propose alternatives to the lack of integration and cooperation of industrial firms in a Brazilian cluster of the jewelry sector. The relationships between the functional factors and the surrounding factors of the cluster are examined.Design/methodology/approachThis research is based on a face‐to‐face survey that established relationships between the internal factor/variables of the companies, the cluster and the external environment's factor/variables.FindingsIt was found that integration and cooperation are essential for the development of a cluster since it stimulates the use of local resources. High levels of clusters' inter‐firm integration may represent high levels of operational efficiency.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has some limitations related to generalizations, but it can be said that the statistical tools applied to characterize the companies' subgroups in a cluster proved valid. In view of this, further research on other local productive systems is suggested in order to strengthen the propositions making use of the same tools described in this study.Practical implicationsThe findings indicate the need for strategic actions by the companies in order to seize opportunities to promote local innovation.Originality/valueThe paper indicates an enterprise's classification according to the characteristics of the company's competitive strategy.

The development of an initial framework for multi-firm industrial safety management based on cooperative relationship: A Malaysia case study

“…These two attributes are sine qua non for the establishment of the cooperative network. The trust is a critical factor that hinders and discourages cooperation [27], and it plays a decisive role in cooperation between organizations [5]. The cooperative relationship is also characterized by openness, where firms are in propensity to exchange information, examine the existing differences and find effective solutions that are mutually accepted [6].…”

Cluster Development Approach in India: an Antidote for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises

“…Das also suggested few approaches for cluster promotion like skill formation/ training, local economic development, technology/ innovation support, and expanding trade / exports. Cooperation and integration among firms (Oprime et al, 2011), and universities and research institutes in a cluster also play an important role in development of a cluster (Fundeanu & Badele, 2014). Three key factors for success of clusters studied in India (U.P leather and footwear cluster, Varanasi silk saree cluster and Moradabad brass ware cluster) were decentralized production integrated through a complex web of relations, trust and co-operation and skills of the artisans (Varman & Chakrabarti, 2011).…”

“…Clusters provide pooled market for workers with industry specific skills, provide higher wages to employees, and drive local employment (Wennberg & Lindqvist, 2010). Clusters allow firms to have access to suppliers, qualified human resources, implicit knowledge of production process which increase firm's competitiveness (Oprime et al, 2011). Clusters makes marketing and sales easier, contributed positively towards regional economic development, rural income generation and poverty alleviation (Das & Das, 2011).…”

Analysis of the interplay between knowledge and performance management in industrial clusters

“…The authors also suggest that participating in meetings and events and using coordination and advisory services enhance several dimensions of a company's performance. Nonetheless, researchers often report on the difficulties of achieving cooperation in multi-firm relationships, especially because firms tend to have different cooperation interests according to their particular objectives (Oprime et al, 2011).…”