2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/7539628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships of Stresses on Alveolar Bone and Abutment of Dental Implant from Various Bite Forces by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Abstract: Occlusal trauma caused by improper bite forces owing to the lack of periodontal membrane may lead to bone resorption, which is still a problem for the success of dental implant. In our study, to avoid occlusal trauma, we put forward a hypothesis that a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) pressure sensor is settled on an implant abutment to track stress on the abutment and predict the stress on alveolar bone for controlling bite forces in real time. Loading forces of different magnitudes (0 N–100 N) and angles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard anatomical teeth model of maxillary central incisor, maxillary lateral incisor, maxillary cuspid, maxillary first molar, mandibular first molar, and mandibular first premolar was scanned using a microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) scanner (Skyscan1172, Micro Photonics Inc., Allentown, PA). Next, transverse sections were generated and processed using Mimics v21.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) ( He et al, 2017 ; Kang et al, 2020 ; Oliveira et al, 2020 ). Then, we imported the model files into ANSYS workbench18.0 (ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, United States) and established the finite element models consisting of root-analog implants and their surrounding tissues, including mucosa, cortical bone, and cancellous bone ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Standard anatomical teeth model of maxillary central incisor, maxillary lateral incisor, maxillary cuspid, maxillary first molar, mandibular first molar, and mandibular first premolar was scanned using a microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) scanner (Skyscan1172, Micro Photonics Inc., Allentown, PA). Next, transverse sections were generated and processed using Mimics v21.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) ( He et al, 2017 ; Kang et al, 2020 ; Oliveira et al, 2020 ). Then, we imported the model files into ANSYS workbench18.0 (ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, United States) and established the finite element models consisting of root-analog implants and their surrounding tissues, including mucosa, cortical bone, and cancellous bone ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANSYS workbench was used to load the FEA models with hypothetical experimental conditions ( Dantas et al, 2020 ; Kang et al, 2020 ). Based on our experimental design, we applied vertical, horizontal, and oblique instantaneous loads of 100N on the models to simulate the masticatory force on teeth daily.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the parts of dental implant that was used in this study. Result of this study found that a sine function can define alveolar bone force-stress corelation17) …”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For instance, a marine hydrographic survey calls for sensors in the operation range of 0–60 MPa and wind tunnel tests demand sensors in the range up to 2.3–43.4 MPa . Some biomedical applications also require a wide pressure operation range, such as the analysis of plantar pressure distributions up to 1.75 MPa and the stress tracking of dental implants under the impact of biting actions from 1.5 to 8.66 MPa . Therefore, pressure sensors with high sensitivity and a wide operation range are important, especially for the development of flexible transducers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%