1982
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90105-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative accuracy of four removable die systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was similar to the results obtained in the previous studies. 2,3,12,14 The displacement of the dies can be attributed to:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was similar to the results obtained in the previous studies. 2,3,12,14 The displacement of the dies can be attributed to:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was in agreement with the result of the other investigators. 2,3,[12][13][14][15][16][17] This difference indicated the amount of vertical and horizontal displacements of each die within a group. The displacement exhibited both a positive value and a negative value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The master casts on which fixed prostheses are fabricated must properly reproduce an abutment whether the case involves a single unit or multiple units in an entire arch rehabilitation. [1][2][3] They must achieve certain specifications with respect to dimensional accuracy, detail reproduction, surface hardness, abrasive resistance, compatibility with impression materials, transverse strength, ease of manipulation, and lack of toxicity. 4 Improved dental stone and epoxy resin are the most popular materials in dentistry for constructing master casts for fixed prostheses, even though a resin-reinforced gypsum product, a polyurethane resin, and silver and copper electroplated die systems have all been used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%