2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative binding affinities of bisphosphonates for human bone and relationship to antiresorptive efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
90
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for the short-term effect of the pre-OVX treatment with risedronate is that risedronate, which has a high affinity to bone [9,13], administered before OVX, might be retained in the bone and act on the osteoclasts after OVX. Stopping treatment with risedronate may not promptly reverse its benefit, because of the long residence time of risedronate in the bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for the short-term effect of the pre-OVX treatment with risedronate is that risedronate, which has a high affinity to bone [9,13], administered before OVX, might be retained in the bone and act on the osteoclasts after OVX. Stopping treatment with risedronate may not promptly reverse its benefit, because of the long residence time of risedronate in the bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have shown that different bisphosphonates vary in their affinity for bone surfaces and their level of bone penetration. (12,40) The use of medium-or low-affinity bisphosphonates as the targeting molecule may better reflect changes in osteoclast activity because of their relatively greater uptake in regions of bone resorption compared with quiescent surfaces. (12) Additional histological analyses will be needed to more precisely define subregions within the bone with more rapid uptake of high-versus low-affinity bisphosphonates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro, alendronate and pamidronate were comparable in displacing FRFP, consistent with similar binding constants found between these drugs in (14) C-labeled bisphosphonate studies. (44) In vivo, nearly 90% of the fluorescent signal from FRFP localized to bone within 2 to 6 hours of injection. This compares favorably with studies of (14) C-labeled pamidronate, in which skeletal distribution is rapid initially, slows after 6 hours, and yields peak binding after 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%