2013
DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2013.139.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Discriminating Powers of GGE and AMMI Models in the Selection of Tropical Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
24
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
10
24
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The G1 and G4 genotypes were the most unstable and generated average yields higher than those of G23, at 3490.05 and 3683.62 kg/ ha, respectively. Genotype G7 showed the greatest yield and the greatest averages for most of the environments studied, and a higher average yield of 5916.67 kg/ha was obtained in Sinop in season 2011/2012 (Table 3), which is consistent with the results reported by Amira et al (2013), who observed that the most productive genotypes were among the most unstable. Unstable genotypes respond better to environmental oscillations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The G1 and G4 genotypes were the most unstable and generated average yields higher than those of G23, at 3490.05 and 3683.62 kg/ ha, respectively. Genotype G7 showed the greatest yield and the greatest averages for most of the environments studied, and a higher average yield of 5916.67 kg/ha was obtained in Sinop in season 2011/2012 (Table 3), which is consistent with the results reported by Amira et al (2013), who observed that the most productive genotypes were among the most unstable. Unstable genotypes respond better to environmental oscillations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This result is lower than that observed by Amira et al (2013) (86.6%) and similar to that found by Asfaw et al (2009) (61.50%). When using the first two principal components, four clusters of environments (mega-environments) were formed using the GGE biplot methodology (Figure 3), corroborating the results obtained by Amira et al (2013).…”
Section: Figurasupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essa representação simultânea de cada genótipo e ambiente, além de fornecer informações sobre a estabilidade e a adaptabilidade fenotípica, permite o zoneamento agronômico e a escolha de locais-chave para o processo de avaliação e seleção de cultivares. Em soja, esse tipo de análise vem sendo bastante utilizado (Yan, 2001;Asfaw et al, 2009;Meotti et al, 2012;Martins et al, 2012;Amira et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…This factor together with the intrinsic characteristics of genotype x environment interaction (G x E) culminate in phenotype expression. Breeders through plant breeding seek to mitigate the effect of this interaction in the development of adapted and stable cultivars for various regions and climate conditions (Amira et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%