1985
DOI: 10.1130/spe206-p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Motions Between Oceanic and Continental Plates in the Pacific Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

45
1,088
9
17

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,231 publications
(1,181 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
45
1,088
9
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Lavas emplaced between 22 and 12 Ma may have resulted from this reorganization, which might have involved changes in the rate of convergence of the plates and the subduction angle. Gómez-Tuena and Carrasco-Núñez (2000) proposed that this subduction scenario started at about 20 Ma with a high convergence rate of 120 mm/yr (Engebretson et al, 1985) and a very shallow dip-angle of about 11°, which might eventually cause the production of magmas after more than 5 Ma at very distal areas from the trench. However, no petrogenetic relationships were tested by these authors using geochemical modeling.…”
Section: Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lavas emplaced between 22 and 12 Ma may have resulted from this reorganization, which might have involved changes in the rate of convergence of the plates and the subduction angle. Gómez-Tuena and Carrasco-Núñez (2000) proposed that this subduction scenario started at about 20 Ma with a high convergence rate of 120 mm/yr (Engebretson et al, 1985) and a very shallow dip-angle of about 11°, which might eventually cause the production of magmas after more than 5 Ma at very distal areas from the trench. However, no petrogenetic relationships were tested by these authors using geochemical modeling.…”
Section: Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference may be due to the limited quantity of paleostress data available; however, I will argue in Section 4.5 that it represents a Figure 1. Schematic and qualitative tectonic history, based on Engebretson et al [1985], de Cserna [1989, Axen et al [1993], and Bird [1998]. No palinspastic restoration is attempted (except in the Pacific basin).…”
Section: Interpolation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…경상분지의 발달초기 즉, 백악기 초인 약 140 Ma 경에는 패러론(Farallon)판과 이자나기(Izanagi)판 사 이의 남북 주향을 가지는 해령경계가 유라시아 대륙 의 동변부에 도착하였을 가능성이 높다 (Engebretson et al, 1985). 이후 백악기 동안 유라시아판 아래로 이자나기-태평양판의 섭입과 관련된 화성활동이 동아 시아 일원에 광범위하게 일어났으며 (Chough and Sohn, 2010), 이로 인한 코디레라-형 조산운동은 강력 한 중성-산성의 화성활동을 발생시켜 유라시아 대륙의 지각성장의 원인이 된 것으로 알려져 있다 (Rogers, 1993).…”
Section: 남한의 백악기 화강암류unclassified
“…-남남서 방향의 해구에 도달하여 섭입된 것으로 알려 져 있다 (Uyeda and Miyashiro, 1974;Hilde et al, 1977;Engebretson et al, 1985;Maruyama et al, 1997;Kinoshita, 2002;Chough and Sohn, 2010;Hwang et al, 2011). 당시의 해구와 해령은 Kinoshita (2002)의 연구결과에 따라 약 52 o 의 각도로 서로 사교 한 것으로 가정하였다 (Fig.…”
Section: -80 Ma 경에 유라시아 대륙의 동쪽 연변부에는 이자나기-태평양 해령(Izanagi-pacific Riunclassified