1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83651-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Value of Incidence and Mortality Data in Cancer Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Death certification for laryngeal cancer is sufficiently reliable to permit meaningful inference on trends for most European countries. 16,17 No major changes in the classification and coding of laryngeal cancer occurred across subsequent Revisions of the ICD, thus it is unlikely that mortality trends have been materially influenced by changes in diagnosis and certification of the disease. In particular, data in middle-age are more reliable and valid than the overall ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Death certification for laryngeal cancer is sufficiently reliable to permit meaningful inference on trends for most European countries. 16,17 No major changes in the classification and coding of laryngeal cancer occurred across subsequent Revisions of the ICD, thus it is unlikely that mortality trends have been materially influenced by changes in diagnosis and certification of the disease. In particular, data in middle-age are more reliable and valid than the overall ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When interpreting trends in cancer mortality, it is important to consider the problems of death certification reliability and validity [23,24]. In general, for several common cancer sites including lung, stomach and breast, death certification is sufficiently reliable to permit meaningful inference with respect to trends [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite potential uncertainties in the distinction between hypophaynx and epilarynx, 15,16 and a moderate degree of overreporting of this cause of death in the 1970s, 17 death certification for laryngeal cancer is sufficiently reliable to permit meaningful inference on trends for most European countries. 17,18 As no major change has been introduced in the classification and coding of laryngeal cancer across subsequent revisions of ICD, it is unlikely that these trends have been materially influenced by changes in diagnosis and certification of the disease. Furthermore, rates in the middle-aged population are less likely to be affected by certification problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%