1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf01408297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic effects in the variable-screening model

Abstract: The variable-screening model devised for a quantitative treatment of screening effects in slow (quasimolecular) ion-atom collisions is extended to include relativistic effects. Relativistic correction terms corresponding to a relative energy correction of second order in the electron velocity are incorporated into the effective molecular single-electron Hamiltonian. The model is applied to the calculation of relativistic molecular-orbital correlation diagrams for the quasimolecular systems Br + Br, Xe + Xe, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, for later discussion, we define the following absolute times (/ =0 at nuclear contact between the 238 U projectile and 238 U target): t\, the deep-inelastic sticking time; t 2 , the time for the two U-like products to reach jRmin; he, the time at which a U-like product scissions; and ^3, the time at which the fission products, e.g., Pd + Pd for symmetric fission, reach a relative separation such that their \s<j MO energy still lies within -10 keV of Z?A:(U) [5]. With these definitions, emission of a Ulike K x ray followed by late fission occurs in the interval between t 2 and t 3 .…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, for later discussion, we define the following absolute times (/ =0 at nuclear contact between the 238 U projectile and 238 U target): t\, the deep-inelastic sticking time; t 2 , the time for the two U-like products to reach jRmin; he, the time at which a U-like product scissions; and ^3, the time at which the fission products, e.g., Pd + Pd for symmetric fission, reach a relative separation such that their \s<j MO energy still lies within -10 keV of Z?A:(U) [5]. With these definitions, emission of a Ulike K x ray followed by late fission occurs in the interval between t 2 and t 3 .…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is related to that proposed by Gugelot [4] and, although not as detailed as the other methods, has the advantage that the information is obtained simply and is essentially free of nuclear models. We first discuss the experimental findings, then provide an interpretation using molecularorbital (MO) correlation diagrams for two-and threebody atomic systems [5][6][7]. Figure 1 sketches the experimental arrangement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 It is important to emphasize that the Rosenthal pseudocrossings can have no effect on electron promotion; instead, they only affect the relative subshell vacancy production. Nevertheless, this problem was largely unsolved until the advent of the quantitative calculations.55,56, 60 Larkins,55 on the basis of a correlation diagram constructed by a Hartree-Fock calculation on Ne-Ne, assumed that the Rosenthal pseudocrossing 3pc-3dc (see These results are shown in Figure 30. On the other hand, for asymmetric collisions, the new set of rules56 seems to be favored.…”
Section: New Results With Correlation Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze two-collision MO x-ray cross sections, it is desirable to measure simultaneously MO x rays, projectile SA K x rays, and spectroscopic features of the projectile K x-ray spectra (Kaufmann et aL, 1973). Line shapes taken with bent-crystal spectrometers, line shifts (Greenberg et aL, 1977), or Ka to K(3 intensity ratios give information about the L and M shell populations which affect the projectile K x-ray decay rates in Eq.…”
Section: Molecular X-ray Transition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%