2006
DOI: 10.1038/nature05087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic ejecta from X-ray flash XRF 060218 and the rate of cosmic explosions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

56
740
3
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 509 publications
(805 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
56
740
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The motivation for this work is, on the one hand, to assess the ability of the magnetar model in reproducing 4 There is no evidence for strong collimation in the class of lowluminosity GRBs (see e.g., Soderberg et al 2006). Some SNe Ic-BL show evidence for mildly relativistic ejecta (SN 2009bb, Soderberg et al 2010SN 2012ap, Margutti et al 2014, Chakraborti et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation for this work is, on the one hand, to assess the ability of the magnetar model in reproducing 4 There is no evidence for strong collimation in the class of lowluminosity GRBs (see e.g., Soderberg et al 2006). Some SNe Ic-BL show evidence for mildly relativistic ejecta (SN 2009bb, Soderberg et al 2010SN 2012ap, Margutti et al 2014, Chakraborti et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows the expected areal densities of extragalactic radio transients brighter than 0.1 mJy within given distances. The areal densities of type Ibc supernovae(SNe Ibc; Berger et al 2003;Soderberg et al 2006b), low-luminosity GRBs(LLGRB; Soderberg et al 2006a;Barniol Duran et al 2015), and tidal disruption events(TDEs) without strong jets Holoien et al 2015;van Velzen et al 2016) are so small that it will be quite rare to detect them as false positive transients. Although off-axis long GRBs(LGRBs; van Eerten et al 2010; Ghirlanda et al 2014) and tidal disruption events with strong jets (TDE(jet); Burrows et al 2011;Zauderer et al 2011;Berger et al 2012) can be false positive transients, they will be identified earlier through their optical counterparts or can be filtered by identifying their host galaxies since the typical distance of these events is far beyond the detectable distance of the GW networks.…”
Section: False Positives: Extragalactic Radio Transients and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angular and energetic properties suggest that brief engines (with T inj < T breakout , either due to short T inj or large θ 0 ) represent excellent models to explain the debated llGRBs. In particular, brief engines' jets display two of llGRBs peculiar, and hard to explain, features: 1) an estimated llGRBs rate ~100 times higher than that of GRBs [3,4,5] and, 2) a potentially energetic SN emission ~ 10 51-52 erg [6] (as most of these failed jets' are not well collimated and expands with sub-relativistic velocities). These two features only arise from brief engines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…llGRBs and their contrast to classical GRBs, present a challenge to the traditional collapsar model. Apart from being several orders of magnitude softer than typical GRBs, llGRBs show: 1) Huge rates, ~100 times than typical GRBs: ~220 Gpc -3 yr -1 [9], ~110 Gpc -3 yr -1 [10], ~260 Gpc -3 yr -1 [11], a rate of llGRBs/GRBs ~ 300 -1000 [12], ~325 Gpc -3 yr -1 [5] and, ~380 Gpc -3 yr -1 [13] (the rate of GRB is ~1 Gpc-3 yr-1). 2) Strong and clear SN connection, in contrast with the typically SN-less GRBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation