1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.57.2916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Hartree Calculations for Axially Deformed Nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our RTF and RETF results for the excitation energy of the isoscalar giant monopole resonance (GMR) obtained in the scaling approach are displayed in [45] (K ∞ = 399 MeV, m * ∞ /m = 0.67). The predictive power of these parametrizations is well known and some examples can be found, e.g., in Ref.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our RTF and RETF results for the excitation energy of the isoscalar giant monopole resonance (GMR) obtained in the scaling approach are displayed in [45] (K ∞ = 399 MeV, m * ∞ /m = 0.67). The predictive power of these parametrizations is well known and some examples can be found, e.g., in Ref.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculations of Carbon isotopes, the DWS basis parameters are taken as follows: the spherical box-size is fixed to 30 fm and consistently the numbers of basis states with positive and negative energies are chosen as 48 and 12, respectively. In this work, we performed systematical calculations for the Carbon isotopes from 10 C to 22 C by the RHFB and RHB theories, utilizing the effective interactions with density-dependent meson couplings, namely PKA1 [24], PKO2 [25] and PKO3 [25], PKDD [40] and DD-ME2 [41], and the ones with nonlinear self-couplings, i.e., PK1 [40] and NL2 [42]. The details of the selected effective Lagrangians are referred to Table I.…”
Section: Arxiv:12105388v2 [Nucl-th] 23 Feb 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest parameter sets obtained were NL1 (K ∞ = 211 MeV) [24] and NL2 (K ∞ = 399 MeV) [38]. However, due to the large asymmetry energy J, these sets were not appropriate for nuclei away from the stability line.…”
Section: The Nonlinear-σ Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%