1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2313(97)00201-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxation dynamics into two types of luminescence states in C60 single crystals below 80 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…55 The fluorescence spectra for isolated C 60 suggest that the origin of the S 0 → S 1 transition is about 1.94 eV; 57 in the solid state, this value reduces to about 1.7 eV. 58 BLYP underestimates the energy of S 1 in both systems, while B3LYP underestimates it for pentacene and agrees reasonably well with the experimental result for C 60 . Without tuning of the range-separation parameter, the LRC functionals significantly overestimate the S 0 →S 1 transition for both molecules.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…55 The fluorescence spectra for isolated C 60 suggest that the origin of the S 0 → S 1 transition is about 1.94 eV; 57 in the solid state, this value reduces to about 1.7 eV. 58 BLYP underestimates the energy of S 1 in both systems, while B3LYP underestimates it for pentacene and agrees reasonably well with the experimental result for C 60 . Without tuning of the range-separation parameter, the LRC functionals significantly overestimate the S 0 →S 1 transition for both molecules.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…1.94 eV; 42 in the solid state, this value reduces to 1.7 eV. 43 The TDDFT energies are in good agreement with experiment in the case of pentacene but somewhat higher than the experimental values in the case of C 60 . As in the case of the molecular orbital energies, there are only very small differences between the DFT/ω(vac) and DFT/ω(vac)/PCM estimates, whereas significant modifications occur when going to the DFT/ω(PCM)/PCM level.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…The absence of any C 60 emission in highly crystalline regions suggests that in these regions the lowest singlet transitions are still parity-forbidden like in an isolated C 60 molecule; thus, most of the singlet excitons may undergo an intersystem crossing to triplet excitons or may be quenched by diffusion to the metal substrate, instead of recombining radiatively at the emission center. However, if the generated singlet excitons are able to diffuse within their lifetime (∼0.7 ns , ) to a structural defect of sufficient ungerade character of the exciton wave function, their radiative recombination is substantially enhanced. Additionally, the trapping of excitons might hamper their diffusion to the substrate and reduce their nonradiative decay channels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%