1977
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90995-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Release of [3H]acetylcholine from rat hippocampal slices: Effect of septal lesion and of graded concentrations of muscarinic agonists and antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results therefore suggest that the ACh released from presynaptic nerves significantly inhibits further release of ACh. A similar effect has been described in the central nervous system using potassium evoked ACh release (Szerb, Hadhazy & Dudar, 1977) although this was not seen in more refined electrophysiological studies (Valentino & Dingledine, 1981). The results also imply that ACh released from presynaptic nerves acts on terminals of fibres which release another transmitter which causes the slow e.p.s.p., probably substance P. This finding is therefore closely analogous to that by Lundberg, Anggard, Emson, Fahrenkroug & Hokfelt (1981) that VIP released by repetitive stimulation of post-ganglionic parasympathetic fibres is greatly increased by atropine, suggesting inhibition by concomitantly released ACh.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Our results therefore suggest that the ACh released from presynaptic nerves significantly inhibits further release of ACh. A similar effect has been described in the central nervous system using potassium evoked ACh release (Szerb, Hadhazy & Dudar, 1977) although this was not seen in more refined electrophysiological studies (Valentino & Dingledine, 1981). The results also imply that ACh released from presynaptic nerves acts on terminals of fibres which release another transmitter which causes the slow e.p.s.p., probably substance P. This finding is therefore closely analogous to that by Lundberg, Anggard, Emson, Fahrenkroug & Hokfelt (1981) that VIP released by repetitive stimulation of post-ganglionic parasympathetic fibres is greatly increased by atropine, suggesting inhibition by concomitantly released ACh.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…refs. 26 and 27) exerted at autoreceptors on the terminals of septal afferents (28). As shown here, muscarinic antagonists produce substantial release in vivo, whereas muscarinic agonists inhibit both basal and evoked release by 30-40% (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The galanin-produced inhibition of the evoked release of AcCho is as potent as the muscarinic feedback inhibition. In vivo, galanin fully blocked the scopolamine-enhanced release, which was most due to disinhibition of the muscarinic feedback by antagonist (26)(27)(28). A basic difference between the inhibitory actions of muscarinic agonists and galanin seems to be that the former are also potent in altering basal AcCho outflow, whereas galanin seems to inhibit only the evoked release and in our …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It should be borne in mind that the dopamine receptor within the striatum is known to be heterogeneous (Nagy et al 1978;Schwarcz et al 1978) while the muscarinic receptor also exists in pre-and postsynaptic regions (Szerb et al 1977;Aguilar et al 1979). The effect of various heavy metals upon the muscarinic has been previously reported (Aronstam and Eldefrawi 1979) and mercuric chloride was found to be much more effective in vitro than lead nitrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%