Samples from a former manufactured gas plant (MGP)
site in Santa Barbara, CA, were tested to evaluate the
environmentally acceptable endpoints (EAE) process for
setting risk-based cleanup criteria. The research was part
of an ongoing effort to develop and demonstrate a
protocol for assessing risk-based criteria for MGP sites
that incorporates the availability of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs). Six samples were tested: source
soil, treated source soil, aged soil, lampblack soil, background
soil, and spiked soil. The samples were subjected to a
battery of physical and biological tests that focused on
determining the “availability” of the soil-bound contaminants
to groundwater, ecological receptors, and human
receptors. Different assays yielded similar qualitative
results, but the magnitude of the effects differed significantly.
Each assay has unique inherent limitations, but the
earthworm uptake assay is preferred because it is reliable,
inexpensive, and sensitive at meaningful soil concentrations.
Results demonstrated that sorption to soil, matrix effects,
aging, and treatment can significantly reduce chemical
availability. Including these reduced availability results in
risk assessment calculations yielded environmentally
protective cleanup levels almost 3−10 times greater than
levels derived using California default risk assessment
assumptions. Using an EAE-based approach for MGP soils,
especially those containing lampblack, could provide
more realistic risk assessments.