2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of actors in bridging positions for product-related information diffusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Norms represent an influential factor since individuals generally have an innate need for companionship and association with other humans (c.f., Cialdini and Goldstein, 2004; for a discussion). Likewise, innovation diffusion research has shown consumers' adoption intention can be influenced when their peers start adopting new products (Rogers, 2010;Pescher and Spann, 2014). Thus, we assume that norms should play a key role in understanding consumers' reactions towards smart glasses.…”
Section: Social Normsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Norms represent an influential factor since individuals generally have an innate need for companionship and association with other humans (c.f., Cialdini and Goldstein, 2004; for a discussion). Likewise, innovation diffusion research has shown consumers' adoption intention can be influenced when their peers start adopting new products (Rogers, 2010;Pescher and Spann, 2014). Thus, we assume that norms should play a key role in understanding consumers' reactions towards smart glasses.…”
Section: Social Normsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Third, although Iyengar et al (2011b) find that susceptibility to social influence does not vary with one's network position (i.e. degree centrality), most previous research has documented monotonic (negative) relationships between network centrality and susceptibility to social influence (Aral and Walker, 2012;Bapna and Umyarov, 2015;Lee, 2014;Pescher and Spann, 2014). Furthermore, two recent studies by Hu and Van den Bulte (2014) and Iyengar et al (2015) provide interesting evidence of an inverse-U relation between status (measured by degree centrality) and susceptibility to social contagion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Adoption intention: Here we tested the expected easiness to use the technology as well as adoption intentions regarding the using and purchasing [53]. Further, works by [54], [55] have shown that adoption intentions can be affected based on the adoption intention of their peers.…”
Section: User Perceptions About Future Digital Smell Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further 51.7% said if they have financial resources they would like to buy it. probably, the rest of the participants who rated the device is easy to use or would like try are fallen into the category of 'influenced by peers' as discussed in [54], [55], [53], which means when the people started to use Digital Smell Device the more people will purchase and use in their daily life.…”
Section: ) Research Process and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%