Reliabilität des Diagnostischen Interviews bei Psychischen Störungen (DIPS für DSM-IV-TR) unter klinischen Routinebedingungen

Suppiger, Andrea; In‐Albon, Tina; Herren, Chantal; Bader, Klaus; Schneider, Silvia; Margraf, Jürgen

doi:10.1159/000169699

Cited by 43 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The interrater reliabilities of the F-DIPS (Yule's Y coefficient) in patient samples were 0.69, 0.82, and 1.00 for panic disorder without agoraphobia, panic disorder with agoraphobia, and panic disorder with/without agoraphobia; 0.74 and 0.99 for agoraphobia without panic disorder and 0.61 and 0.98 for social phobia, respectively (n 5 191; [53] n 5 237 [54] ). Retest reliabilities across groups of disorders were between 0.68 and 0.79 (K coefficient) and 0.67 and 1.0 (Yule's coefficient).…”

Section: Procedures and Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Health anxiety and fear of fear in panic disorder and agoraphobia vs. social phobia: a prospective longitudinal study

et al. 2010

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Procedures and Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Retest reliabilities across groups of disorders were between 0.68 and 0.79 (K coefficient) and 0.67 and 1.0 (Yule's coefficient). [54,55] In addition, the interview has demonstrated high validity [56,57] as well as good acceptance in clinical practice and research settings. [58] Interviewers, training procedure, and supervision.…”

Section: Procedures and Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health anxiety and fear of fear in panic disorder and agoraphobia vs. social phobia: a prospective longitudinal study

et al. 2010

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interrater reliability is good for anxiety diagnoses, affective disorders, eating disorders, substance disorders, sleeping disorders and for the status of no diagnosis, with between 0.72 and 0.92. Test-retest reliability is also good for anxiety diagnoses, affective disorders, somatoform disorders, eating disorders and substance disorders, with between 0.62 and 0.94, and is lower for sleeping disorders, with = 0.35 [40] . For the present study, mothers and fathers were assigned a 1 if they had a lifetime diagnosis of any emotional disorder, including generalized anxiety, panic, phobias, major depression, dysthymia or bipolar disorder, and a 0 for no lifetime affective disorder.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Early Predictors of Separation Anxiety Disorder: Early Stranger Anxiety, Parental Pathology and Prenatal Factors

et al. 2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Separation anxiety disorder (SAD) is defined as anxiety over being away from a loved one, usually a parent, and is one of the most common anxiety disorders in children under 18 years of age [1] , with median prevalence rates between 1.09 and 4.1% in English-speaking children aged 5-11 [2-4] and 0.75% in Swiss children aged 7-16 years [5] . Further, SAD is a well-established predictor of later psychopathology, including depression, panic dis order with and without agoraphobia [6][7][8] , generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, pain disorder, alcohol dependence [9] , specific phobia, posttraumatic stress disorder and acute stress [10] . Despite its significance, a thorough etiological profile of the factors contributing to SAD is not yet complete.Current models of the development of anxiety in children tend to focus on anxiety disorders in general, and have not been specifically tested with children with specific disorders such as SAD. Further, existing models, while expansive, may not be completely comprehensive. Key WordsSeparation anxiety disorder ؒ Parental pathology ؒ Prenatal risk factors ؒ Pregnancy ؒ Stranger anxiety Abstract Objective: The present study seeks to extend research on the etiology of separation anxiety disorder (SAD) in a German-speaking sample by examining differences between children with SAD and healthy comparisons, using a retrospective-reporting paradigm. Method: The sample included 106 children with SAD and 44 healthy children between the ages of 4 and 14 years. Parents completed questionnaires and structured clinical interviews to assess parental pathology, pregnancy variables and strong early stranger anxiety. Results: Children with SAD were more likely than healthy children to have had a phase of stronger stranger anxiety in infancy. Further, early stranger anxiety remained a significant predictor of SAD after controlling for maternal depression. Meaningful effects were not found for the influence of parental age at birth or other pregnancy factors. Conclusion: This study provides beginning evidence of the potential predictive value of strong stranger anxiety in distinguishing children with SAD from those with no disorder, above and beyond the influence of parental pathology.

show abstract

“…The F-DIPS is an earlier version of the DIPS [26,54,57] and is based on a German translation and extension of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-IV-L) [14]. It is a structured interview for the assessment of Axis I mental disorders according to DSM-IV [1].…”

Section: Diagnostic Assessment: F-dipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, although F-DIPS diagnostic interview in this version has only been used for this study and the study of psychometric properties are just part of a dissertation, it is based on a well-established interview, the ADIS-IV-L [14], with good psychometric properties. Furthermore, note that its updated version, the DIPS, that is largely based on the F-DIPS shows good reliability and validity [26,57].…”

Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Study Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Dresden Predictor Study of anxiety and depression: objectives, design, and methods

Trumpf

Vriends

Meyer

et al. 2009

Soc Psychiat Epidemiol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The present report describes the objectives, design, and methods of the Dresden Predictor Study (DPS) of anxiety and depression, a prospective epidemiological study investigating anxiety disorders and depression in 3,065 young German women (18-25 years of age). Materials and methods The DPS consists of a baseline and one follow-up investigation separated by approximately 17 months. At both time points, respondents were diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) using an extended German version of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-IV-L). In addition to diagnostic assessment, respondents completed a battery of self-report questionnaires that provided detailed information about potential predictors of disorders and a comprehensive dimensional assessment of psychopathology. Discussion and conclusionsResults on both response bias in the baseline investigation and effects of dropout at follow-up are presented, and strengths and limitations of the study design are discussed.

show abstract

Reliabilität des Diagnostischen Interviews bei Psychischen Störungen (DIPS für DSM-IV-TR) unter klinischen Routinebedingungen

Cited by 43 publications

References 14 publications

Health anxiety and fear of fear in panic disorder and agoraphobia vs. social phobia: a prospective longitudinal study

Health anxiety and fear of fear in panic disorder and agoraphobia vs. social phobia: a prospective longitudinal study

Early Predictors of Separation Anxiety Disorder: Early Stranger Anxiety, Parental Pathology and Prenatal Factors

The Dresden Predictor Study of anxiety and depression: objectives, design, and methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About