2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis of soil liquefaction based on standard penetration test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an exact evaluation of this probability is not an easy task. Indeed, it is so tough to accurately determine the (PDFs) of random variables such as (R) and (S) (Jha and Suzuki 2009). A simplified calculation approach, the first order and second moment method, have been improved to meet this need.…”
Section: Methodology Of Reliability Probabilistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an exact evaluation of this probability is not an easy task. Indeed, it is so tough to accurately determine the (PDFs) of random variables such as (R) and (S) (Jha and Suzuki 2009). A simplified calculation approach, the first order and second moment method, have been improved to meet this need.…”
Section: Methodology Of Reliability Probabilistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the PL -β mapping functions, the probability of failure was determined. A comparative study was conducted on SPT data by different reliability methods (FOSM, Advanced FOSM, Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and Point Estimation Method (PEM)) by Jha et al (2008) against soil liquefaction and presented a combined method of FOSM and PEM to find out a minimum safety factor to be adopted in soil liquefaction analysis. Singnar and Sil (2018) evaluated the liquefaction potential of Guwahati city using both Deterministic and FOSM method conducted on 82 boreholes considering the Great Shillong 1897 earthquake of magnitude 8.1.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such numerical computations enable the investigation of a micro-scopic triggering condition of liquefaction; micro-scopic means smaller than the meso-scopic scale, whose dimension is of the order of experimental samples used to observe liquefaction. The dimension of the macro-scopic scale, on the other hand, is of the order of the construction site, where engineering indexes such as the Potential of Liquefaction (PL) [5][6][7] and Factor of safety against Liquefaction (FL) [8] are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%