1991
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-381x(1991)5:3(125)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Analysis of Thaw‐Induced Pore Pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first utilizes the uncertainty within the input parameters to calculate the reliability of FOS (Duncan 2000). The second uses a more in-depth statistical analysis to determine the probability of failure in relation to a critical value (Banerjee and Datta 1991). The third, limit state design, also known as load and resistance factor design (LRFD), applies separate factors to the loading and resistance sides of a calculation to provide a consistent reliability of design (Goble 1999).…”
Section: Reliability Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first utilizes the uncertainty within the input parameters to calculate the reliability of FOS (Duncan 2000). The second uses a more in-depth statistical analysis to determine the probability of failure in relation to a critical value (Banerjee and Datta 1991). The third, limit state design, also known as load and resistance factor design (LRFD), applies separate factors to the loading and resistance sides of a calculation to provide a consistent reliability of design (Goble 1999).…”
Section: Reliability Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to include both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty, Banerjee and Datta (1991) analyzed the reliability of thaw induced pore pressure calculations using Morgenstern and Nixon's Theory (1971). First-order uncertainty analysis of the calculation method was used to mathematically determine the functions of the total, epistemic, and aleatory uncertainty in the calculation of the excess pore water pressure.…”
Section: Reliability Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-[66]. Specifically, for groundwater and seepage for hydraulic structures, most studies have concentrated on stochastic analyses of seepage characteristics based on different realizations of hydraulic conductivity generated from different probability distribution functions (PDF) or sets of means and standard deviations[61] [67]-[72].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%