2009
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.4.3.345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Generality of Measures of Acceleration, Planned Agility, and Reactive Agility

Abstract: Purpose:The purpose of the current study was to assess the reliability of a new protocol that examines different components of agility using commercially available timing gates.Methods:Seventeen physically active males completed four trials of a new protocol, which consisted of a number of 10-m sprints. Sprints were completed in a straight line or with a change of direction after 5 m. The change of direction was either planned or reactive, with participants reacting to a visual light stimulus.Results:There was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it must be noted that there was no significant difference between the mean AS times for test-to-retest and with other sprint and agility tests (paired t-test p > 0.01) (Table 1). In line with our findings, some previous research has found good reliability for measures of linear and change-of-direction agility performance in other tests, including IAR, CODAT and T-Drill tests (Hachana et al, 2013; Hopkins, 2004; Kowacks et al, 1999; Lockie et al, 2013; Oliver and Meyers, 2009). Indeed, the acceptable level of relative reliability, and thus the degree to which the test is useful, is also in the ‘acceptable-to-good’ rating for the AS test and other measured tests for female soccer players.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, it must be noted that there was no significant difference between the mean AS times for test-to-retest and with other sprint and agility tests (paired t-test p > 0.01) (Table 1). In line with our findings, some previous research has found good reliability for measures of linear and change-of-direction agility performance in other tests, including IAR, CODAT and T-Drill tests (Hachana et al, 2013; Hopkins, 2004; Kowacks et al, 1999; Lockie et al, 2013; Oliver and Meyers, 2009). Indeed, the acceptable level of relative reliability, and thus the degree to which the test is useful, is also in the ‘acceptable-to-good’ rating for the AS test and other measured tests for female soccer players.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Time was recorded using a timing lights system (Smartspeed, Fusion Sports, Coopers Plains, Australia), which has previously been found to be reliable when recording speed and agility tests (24). Gates were placed at 0, 5, 10, and 30 m at a height of 1.2 m (20) to measure the 0-to 5-, 0-to 10-, and 0-to 30-m intervals.…”
Section: Thirty-meter Sprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TESTING Agility tests were conducted using Smartspeed (Fusion Sport, Australia) photoelectrical timing gates to provide a flashing light as a generic stimulus for the reactive tests. 9 Subjects completed two repetitions of all tests and the best score was recorded for statistical analysis. Subjects performed all tests in a random order.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects began on the marked line, 30 cm behind the first timing gate as explained by Oliver and Meyers. 9 The test started when the green light stimulus from gates automatically appeared. Subjects reacted to the stimulus and sprinted 5 m forward.…”
Section: Unplanned Soccer Specific Reactive Agility Test (Usrat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation