2018
DOI: 10.1177/0363546518756979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Normative Reference Values for the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) Tool in Youth Athletes

Abstract: The current findings provide preliminary support for the implementation of VOMS baseline assessment into clinical practice, due to a high internal consistency, strong relationships between VOMS items, and a low false-positive rate at baseline in youth athletes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the King–Devick test (KDT) more commonly measures reading speed and language production, it also includes an evaluation of saccades; however, this test does not examine other eye movements often impaired after TBI [31,39,42]. VOMS provides a more complete assessment of eye movements to help clinicians evaluate vestibular and ocular abnormalities after concussion [43]. The VOMS tests saccades, smooth pursuits, fixations, convergence and the vestibular–ocular reflex [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the King–Devick test (KDT) more commonly measures reading speed and language production, it also includes an evaluation of saccades; however, this test does not examine other eye movements often impaired after TBI [31,39,42]. VOMS provides a more complete assessment of eye movements to help clinicians evaluate vestibular and ocular abnormalities after concussion [43]. The VOMS tests saccades, smooth pursuits, fixations, convergence and the vestibular–ocular reflex [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VOMS scores are typically deemed abnormal if there is a symptom severity score change ≥2 from pretest baseline in any symptom domain, as well as an increase in linear NPC ≥5 cm after an SRC. 32,34,44,45 In the current study, individual postexacerbation symptom severity scores for each VOMS symptom component were summed, and the total VOMS score was the sum of all symptom components, which equated to a maximum possible score of 280 (10-point symptom × 7 components × 4 symptom domains). This VOMS total score was not adjusted for one’s pretest/pre-exacerbation performance and did not include NPC distance measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most sensitive categories of this assessment are the near point convergence (5 cm), vestibular ocular reflex (more than two symptoms), and visual motion sensitivity (more than two symptoms). 56,59 The VOMS, however, subjectively assesses these domains by self-reporting symptoms upon provocation. The deficits observed using more direct methods for rapid eye movements are more functionally based.…”
Section: Eye Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%