2018
DOI: 10.5765/jkacap.2018.29.2.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Translation of Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers: A Preliminary Study

Abstract: Objectives:We aimed to assess the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the Korean version of the Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT). Methods: The Korean version of the Q-CHAT and the Korean version of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 1.5-5 were completed by parents of 24 toddlers and preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 80 unselected toddlers and preschoolers. Parents of the ASD group also completed the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another issue is that that the gender breakdown in the case derivation (N = 7: F/M 0:7) and validation (N = 6: F/M 1:5) sample lacks female participants in one case and only has one in the other. Considering that we were screening in general population Controls, and then in a DD sample, this derivation sample falls in line with previous research with small samples or who didn't provide a derivation/validation analysis for this subgroup, with our overall sample size (N = 287) being larger than those studies (Devescovi et al, 2020;Park et al, 2018;Raza et al, 2019;Wong et al, 2014). We do acknowledge that his might be a source of bias, but the results stemming from this analysis replicate the ones reported in Allison et al (2012Allison et al ( , 2008.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Another issue is that that the gender breakdown in the case derivation (N = 7: F/M 0:7) and validation (N = 6: F/M 1:5) sample lacks female participants in one case and only has one in the other. Considering that we were screening in general population Controls, and then in a DD sample, this derivation sample falls in line with previous research with small samples or who didn't provide a derivation/validation analysis for this subgroup, with our overall sample size (N = 287) being larger than those studies (Devescovi et al, 2020;Park et al, 2018;Raza et al, 2019;Wong et al, 2014). We do acknowledge that his might be a source of bias, but the results stemming from this analysis replicate the ones reported in Allison et al (2012Allison et al ( , 2008.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Several papers presented studies in which translated versions of the Q-CHAT were used: Spanish [ 25 ], Persian [ 26 ], and Korean [ 27 ]. Translations into other languages also exist [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of other studies did not support the existence of differences between preschool boys and girls with suspected autism [ 38 ] or found a pattern of overall similarities with few gender differences [ 39 ]. Several studies that used the Q-CHAT reported gender differences with boys scoring higher than girls [ 14 , 40 , 41 ], while some other studies did not demonstrate such differences [ 27 ]. The latter may suggest that girls and boys are less dissimilar than previously thought, but an alternative interpretation could be that currently available instruments under-identify difficulties among girls [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Q-CHAT is a 25-item questionnaire with each item rated by the parents from 0-4. It has been validated for use in multiple countries (Magiati et al, 2015;Mohammadian et al, 2015;Park et al, 2018;Ruta et al, 2019;Wong et al, 2014), and has been reported to show a positive predictive value of 28% for a future ASD diagnosis (using screening at two timepoints) (Allison et al, 2021). Some factors previously reported to increase the likelihood of an autism diagnosis have also been shown to correlate with autism traits at age 18 months -for example, sex (with males scoring higher than females) (Allison et al, 2008;Auyeung et al, 2012;Guthrie et al, 2019) or preterm birth (Gray et al, 2015;Wong et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Q-CHAT is a 25-item questionnaire with each item rated by the parents from 0-4. It has been validated for use in multiple countries (Magiati et al, 2015; Mohammadian et al, 2015; Park et al, 2018; Ruta et al, 2019; Wong et al, 2014), and has been reported to show a positive predictive value of 28% for a future ASD diagnosis (using screening at two timepoints) (Allison et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%