2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9573-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Greek translation of the MOS-HIV health survey in HIV-infected individuals

Abstract: The Greek version of the MOS-HIV had good reliability and validity among patients with AIDS. Convergent and concurrent validity were generally confirmed. The MOS-HIV may be useful in assessing health-related quality of life in AIDS patients in Greece. Further research is needed for the evaluation of the Greek version of the MOS-HIV responsiveness to changes over time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PHS and MHS of the MOS-HIV in this cohort of PLHIV are high and comparable to those found in HIV patients studied in other countries [10, 21, 2931]. Scores on the subscales of the MOS-HIV are even comparable to those found in a general healthy population, except for a lower score for mental health [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…PHS and MHS of the MOS-HIV in this cohort of PLHIV are high and comparable to those found in HIV patients studied in other countries [10, 21, 2931]. Scores on the subscales of the MOS-HIV are even comparable to those found in a general healthy population, except for a lower score for mental health [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It is internally consistent, correlates with concurrent measures of health, discriminates among distinct patient populations, and predicts outcomes 31,32,33,34 . This 35-item questionnaire comprises ten scales (health perceptions, physical function, social function, role function, cognitive function, pain, vitality, mental health, health distress, and quality of life), scored as summated ratings from 0–100 (where higher values indicate better health).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, the ACT-SF measure has not been formally validated in many of the local languages used in this study. However, the reliability and validity of MOS-HIV, the measure upon which the ACTC-SF was based, has been assessed and found to be comparable to the original measure in French, German, Italian, Dutch, UK English translations [27], Thai [28], Chinese [29], and most recently Greek [30], implying that the measure remains reliable and valid across a variety of languages. Regardless, future studies should address measure validation across languages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%