2018
DOI: 10.1111/jar.12550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Dutch Anxiety, Depression And Mood Scale in adults aged <50 years with intellectual disabilities

Abstract: Background Reliable and valid screening instruments for depression and anxiety are needed for adults with intellectual disabilities. Methods Internal consistency (n = 198), inter‐rater reliability (n = 41), test–retest reliability (n = 37) and criterion validity (n = 43) were studied in adults aged between 18 and 49 years. Internal consistency was also studied in a sample with epilepsy (n = 98). Results Internal consistencies of the Dutch ADAMS total scale and subscales were satisfactory to good (α = 0.76–0.92… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adults with intellectual disabilities (IQ ≤ 70) and with depressive symptoms were included in this study. To be included, a minimum score of 14 (clinical cut‐off point) was needed on the Depressive Mood subscale of the Dutch version of the Anxiety, Depression And Mood Scale (ADAMS; range 0–39) (Hamers, van Ool, et al, 2018; Hermans & Evenhuis, 2013). Exclusion criteria were checked by a physician and behavioural scientist who were involved with the care of the participant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adults with intellectual disabilities (IQ ≤ 70) and with depressive symptoms were included in this study. To be included, a minimum score of 14 (clinical cut‐off point) was needed on the Depressive Mood subscale of the Dutch version of the Anxiety, Depression And Mood Scale (ADAMS; range 0–39) (Hamers, van Ool, et al, 2018; Hermans & Evenhuis, 2013). Exclusion criteria were checked by a physician and behavioural scientist who were involved with the care of the participant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary objective of this study was to examine whether BLT is effective in decreasing depressive symptoms in two BLT intervention groups compared to no‐BLT 1 week after the end of BLT. The Depressive Mood subscale (13 items) of the Anxiety, Depression And Mood Scale (ADAMS) was used to study these depressive symptoms prior to BLT (baseline, T0) and 1 week after BLT (T1) (Hamers, van Ool, et al, 2018; Hermans & Evenhuis, 2013; Hermans et al., 2012). The measurements in the control group (no‐BLT) had the same frequency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity and reliability of this structure was investigated in two Dutch samples, one sample older than 50 years of age (N = 198) and one adult sample below 50 years of age (N = 975), 13,15 and was found to be fair to good. The ADAMS consists of 28 items which had to be rated by one professional caregiver on a 4-point scale, ranging from never/no problem to often/severe problem.…”
Section: Mood and Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TRIANGLE is approved by the medical-ethical committee of Kempenhaeghe (No. 15.01), and the medical-ethical committee of Erasmus University medical center concluded that the rules laid down in the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act do not apply to this study (MEC-2016-408).…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation