2011
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2011.2114684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Assessment for Wireless Mesh Networks Under Probabilistic Region Failure Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an assumption, even though realistic for wired networks, seems to be often inadequate for wireless communications. This is due to frequently observed spatial correlation between failures of wireless network elements being result of e.g., natural disasters (tornadoes, heavy rain falls), or malicious human activities (e.g., bomb explosions) [94].…”
Section: Reliability Of Wireless Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an assumption, even though realistic for wired networks, seems to be often inadequate for wireless communications. This is due to frequently observed spatial correlation between failures of wireless network elements being result of e.g., natural disasters (tornadoes, heavy rain falls), or malicious human activities (e.g., bomb explosions) [94].…”
Section: Reliability Of Wireless Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they also have some limitations. For instance, in the model from [94], radius r of the circular failure region is assumed to be constant, which is in obvious contrast to reality. Another constraint remarkably limiting 6 Example region failure probabilities from [94] application of this model in practice refers to probability p i of node failures defined as a unique constant value in each ith area between two consecutive concentric annuluses, as given in Fig.…”
Section: Reliability Of Wireless Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and [29]) defined with respect to either network geometry, or topology. For example, in [30] region failures are modeled by means of circles of constant radius r. Another assumption of [30] is that probability p i of node n failure (being a monotonously decreasing function of distance r n of node n from the failure epicentre), is constant within each ith area between two consecutive concentric annuli (see Fig. 2).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each case, weather radar information has to be broadcast to all the network nodes, additionally increasing the routing algorithm complexity. [30] Available methods of weather-resistant WMN routing seem to be focused mainly on updates of link cost metrics, and do not use other information (e.g., related to network characteristics). In particular, to the best of our knowledge, so far there has been no approach proposed in the literature to improve the performance of a WMN during rain storms that is based on automatic updates of a WMN network topology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture these characteristics, regionbased connectivity was introduced (see e.g., [15][16][17], and [26]). In particular, in [26] it was shown that the difference between connectivity and region-based connectivity can be arbitrarily large.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%