2017
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2017.2732345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Enhancement of Redundancy Management in AFDX Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of ensuring delay, Taubrich et al [15] used Temporal Logic of Actions (TLA) to provide AFDX redundancy management algorithms, which could improve the reliability of AFDX to a certain extent. On this basis, Li et al further proposed two redundancy management schemes applicable to different scenarios [16] , which could further tighten jitter and improve its reliability. The static priority non-preemptive queue scheduling (SPUS) algorithm of the AFDX switch cannot eliminate random jitter in the output packet.…”
Section: 1 Afdxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of ensuring delay, Taubrich et al [15] used Temporal Logic of Actions (TLA) to provide AFDX redundancy management algorithms, which could improve the reliability of AFDX to a certain extent. On this basis, Li et al further proposed two redundancy management schemes applicable to different scenarios [16] , which could further tighten jitter and improve its reliability. The static priority non-preemptive queue scheduling (SPUS) algorithm of the AFDX switch cannot eliminate random jitter in the output packet.…”
Section: 1 Afdxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a potential problem,sequence inversion in redundant channels may lead to redundant transmission failure. Meng deduced and analyzed the variable jitter and delay between consecutive frames as the main factors of this problem through modelling [26], and proposed a method to mitigate its impact.…”
Section: Redundancy and Reliability Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NASA's Langley Research Center proposed a solution which added an independent decision module to the IMA system to monitor sharing independence among the applications of avionics resources [7]; The thesis [8] proposed a method for analyzing the impact of interrupt correlation using the AADL model. The thesis [9] inverted the risk of redundant sequences in the cumulative transmission of the AFDX protocol; an analysis was carried out, and a method to mitigate this risk by limiting the transmission length was proposed. Some scholars have shown through research [10] that the traditional safety assessment methods based on the chain-of-events model considering only compo-nent failure are not applicable to IMA, which is a softwareintensive system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%