2012
DOI: 10.1177/1046496412437614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Estimates for Multilevel Designs in Group Research

Abstract: Items that capture group members' outcomes from small group processes (e.g., satisfaction, cohesion) are often nonindependent. A primary assumption of most measurement models is that the data are independent; applying such models to group-outcome data measured at the individual level of analysis is thus likely to produce inaccurate estimates. A solution to the measurement of nonindependent data involves the use of multilevel modeling to estimate variances at item, individual, and group levels of analysis. Exam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sample item is "How much have you felt angry today?". The between-persons and within-person reliabilities were calculated by using MIXED methods with SPSS 25.0, following the procedure described by Bonito et al (2012). The between-persons reliability was .70, and the within-person reliability was .85.…”
Section: Negative Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample item is "How much have you felt angry today?". The between-persons and within-person reliabilities were calculated by using MIXED methods with SPSS 25.0, following the procedure described by Bonito et al (2012). The between-persons reliability was .70, and the within-person reliability was .85.…”
Section: Negative Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability estimates were then calculated with consideration of variance at the item level, week level, and person level, which provides a reliability estimate similar to a Cronbach’s alpha that is corrected for differences in weeks and persons. This method of reliability analysis is recommended for multilevel designs with data that violate the assumption of independence (Bonito, Ruppel, & Keyton, 2012; Nezlek, 2017)—in this case, longitudinal data with repeated measures. Results from reliability analyses are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ninety (90) learners contributed in the pilot study. The test scores of the learners in literal comprehension, reorganization comprehension and inferential comprehension were 0.852, 0.891 and 0.952 respectively, which indicate high reliability (Airasian, Gay, & Mills, 2000;Bonito, Ruppel, & Keyton, 2012).…”
Section: Research Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%