2018
DOI: 10.33889/ijmems.2018.3.2-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Importance of Components in a Real-Time Computing System with Standby Redundancy Schemes

Abstract: Component importance analysis is to measure the effect on system reliability of component reliabilities, and is used to the system design from the reliability point of view. On the other hand, to guarantee high reliability of real-time computing systems, redundancy has been widely applied, which plays an important role in enhancing system reliability. One of commonly used type of redundancy is the standby redundancy. However, redundancy increases not only the complexity of a system but also the complexity of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In continuity to earlier work, Chib et al (2014Chib et al ( , 2016 used the concept of proviso of rest in analyzing the system model and a two unit cold standby with partial and total failure and priority, Sharma et al (2012) analyzed stochastic behavior of a two-unit system with partial failure and fault detection. Further, Park (2014) carried out a warranty cost analysis for multi-component systems with imperfect repair and Zheng et al (2018) discussed the reliability importance of components with standby redundancy schemes in a real-time computing system. From the above literature, it is clear that all the models have the assumption that the repair facility is continuously available to attend to the repair of the failed unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In continuity to earlier work, Chib et al (2014Chib et al ( , 2016 used the concept of proviso of rest in analyzing the system model and a two unit cold standby with partial and total failure and priority, Sharma et al (2012) analyzed stochastic behavior of a two-unit system with partial failure and fault detection. Further, Park (2014) carried out a warranty cost analysis for multi-component systems with imperfect repair and Zheng et al (2018) discussed the reliability importance of components with standby redundancy schemes in a real-time computing system. From the above literature, it is clear that all the models have the assumption that the repair facility is continuously available to attend to the repair of the failed unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the failure influence degree of meta action will be considered from the following two angles: From the perspective of the influence of node failure probability on the system failure probability, the failure influence degrees of meta action can be depicted by their criticality importance 44,45 . Assume the system's failure probability function noted as Fs(t)${F_s}(t)$, and then the criticality importance (i.e., failure influence degree) of meta action A i can be calculated by: ID1i(t)badbreak=Fi(t)Fs(t)·Fs(t)Fi(t)\begin{equation}I{D_{1i}}(t) = \frac{{{F_i}(t)}}{{{F_s}(t)}} \cdot \frac{{\partial {F_s}(t)}}{{\partial {F_i}(t)}}\end{equation} where ID1i(t)$I{D_{1i}}(t)$ is the failure influence degree of meta action A i under the first aspect, Fi(t)${F_i}(t)$ represents the failure probability function of the meta action A i .…”
Section: Evaluation Of Failure Propagation Intensity Between Meta Act...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analysis was also performed to determine which machine affects the system reliability the most. Zheng et al (2018) performed the sensitivity analysis of a real-time computing system with one warm standby redundancy in the presence of the CCF (common cause failure) with the help of continuous-time Markov chain. The effect of the CCF in case of hot and warm standby redundancy was compared.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%