2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability modeling for mutually dependent competing failure processes due to degradation and random shocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other models considering a changing degradation rate are available in the literature such as Bian and Gebraeel. [6], Rasmekomen and Parlikad [49], Hao et al [14,18,51]. Yet, for all of the models, the idea that the amplitude of the shocks, internal and external, can vary or be random, needs to be studied further.…”
Section: State-based Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models considering a changing degradation rate are available in the literature such as Bian and Gebraeel. [6], Rasmekomen and Parlikad [49], Hao et al [14,18,51]. Yet, for all of the models, the idea that the amplitude of the shocks, internal and external, can vary or be random, needs to be studied further.…”
Section: State-based Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the reliability was weakened significantly as considering mutual dependence. Hao SH et al [31] took advantage of Stress-Strength models and Cumulative damage model to study above similar problem. Cao YS et al [32]explored the two dependent and competing failure processes in the context of multi-state systems with multiple components, and obtained reliability functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research work discussed a mix of different types of shocks. Hao et al [23] proposed a degradation model for mutually dependent competing failure processes due to degradation and random shocks. Random shocks considered in this model are extreme shocks and cumulative shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%