2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00440-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of B-line quantification by different-level observers and a software algorithm using point-of-care lung ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, good inter-observer comparability was found in the assessment of the B pattern and the presence of pleural effusion, as these LUS signs are likely to be the easiest to detect. Inter-observer reproducibility in quantifying the B line was acceptable and approximately equal to the one previously published in a similarly designed study [ 4 ]. Finally, a mutual agreement on the overall estimated likelihood of COVID-19 disease according to the LUS findings was correlated poorly between the observers.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, good inter-observer comparability was found in the assessment of the B pattern and the presence of pleural effusion, as these LUS signs are likely to be the easiest to detect. Inter-observer reproducibility in quantifying the B line was acceptable and approximately equal to the one previously published in a similarly designed study [ 4 ]. Finally, a mutual agreement on the overall estimated likelihood of COVID-19 disease according to the LUS findings was correlated poorly between the observers.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…However, use of LUS may be fraught with certain shortcomings, such as the considerable dependence on the observer’s knowledge and skills, and dependence on the performance and settings of the ultrasound transducer. This operator-dependency is especially emphasized in the real-time point-of-care (POC) LUS examination in the ICU and, therefore, the comparability of LUS findings of different observers may be arguable in certain settings [ 3 , 4 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, emerging ultrasound methods based on computeraided diagnosis are now available [26][27][28] and provide a further and potentially promising option in terms of faster data analysis and applicability to large sets of data, especially for novice sonographers with little or no previous LU experience. 29,30 From the pathophysiologic standpoint, severe COVID-19 is a disease with biphasic evolution, and 2 main phenotypes have been recognized, "type 1" and "type 2," reflecting different parenchymal alterations. 31 LU can help differentiate between the 2 types by demonstrating the degree of heterogeneity of aeration loss.…”
Section: Roles Of Lu In Covid-19-positive Patients Within the Intensive Care Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small number of patients included in this feasibility trial should be acknowledged as a limitation; thus, further research to validate the results of this study is warranted. Previously, a non-integrated automatic B-lines detection application has shown good overall reliability while also stressing the difference in assessment reliability dependent on the operator experience [ 5 ]. The current study's results may help better interpret POC-LUS assessments performed by less-experienced operators and reduce inter-operator variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%