2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of knee joint muscle activity during weight bearing force control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ICC has been chosen as a measure of relative reliability because it considers between and within-subject variance (Larsson et al, 2003;Mathur et al, 2005;Wier, 2005). ICC values of more than 0.75 represent high reliability, values of 0.60-0.74 represents medium reliability, and low or lack of the reliability would be for all values below 0.60 (Smith et al, 2012). For acceptable reliability level, the value of 0.75 was taken as per previous study (Dankaerts et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…ICC has been chosen as a measure of relative reliability because it considers between and within-subject variance (Larsson et al, 2003;Mathur et al, 2005;Wier, 2005). ICC values of more than 0.75 represent high reliability, values of 0.60-0.74 represents medium reliability, and low or lack of the reliability would be for all values below 0.60 (Smith et al, 2012). For acceptable reliability level, the value of 0.75 was taken as per previous study (Dankaerts et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, it is possible for ratios to range from negative to positive infinity. In that case, the alternative measure of reliability -standard error of measurement (SEM) was used to express the absolute reliability of the measure (Smith et al, 2012). Since there were two testing sessions and three trails for each knee angle, additionally paired-sample T-test was used to determine if differences in normalized EMG magnitudes occurred between testing sessions (Smith et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations