2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the conventional approach for stress/fatigue analysis of pitting corroded pipelines – Development of a safer approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the work reported by Mokhtari and Melchers 41 the SCF can be calculated by using l , w and d :…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the work reported by Mokhtari and Melchers 41 the SCF can be calculated by using l , w and d :…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the water pipe failure analysis methods [11], accurately quantifying RWT at the low range (e.g. less than 50 percent of the nominal thickness) is paramount importance.…”
Section: A Extreme Value Marginal Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, some methods such as the fracture mechanics and loss-of-section [6]- [11] have been proposed for computing residual strength or likely failure of the pipe. In contrast to the fracture mechanics approach [8], [10], the loss-of-section technique [11] requires remaining thickness of a pipe wall to be known. In equivalent words, remaining wall thickness (RWT) of a water pipe is required to be measured before its failure analysis can be conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since pipelines operate under high pressure and the transport medium is flammable and explosive, once an accident occurs, it is easy to cause heavy losses. Therefore, it is very important to monitor the safety state of pipelines [2,3].…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%