1976
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1976.43.3f.1037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the Depression Adjective Check Lists

Abstract: Data from 172 college subjects (93 males and 79 females) with mean age = 24.3 yr. (SD, 7.0) were used to replicate and extend previous findings on the alternate form, split-half and test-retest reliability for Set 2 (Forms E, F, G) of the Depression Adjective Check Lists (Lubin, 1967). Findings are reported for complete lists and for the two columns, i.e., "half lists."

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the emotions evoked by each trial, the participants completed a computerized questionnaire (see Table I) including 18 items, of which 13 were adapted from the depression adjective checklist (DACL) [Lubin, 1981] and from previous studies assessing fortune of others emotions [Brigham, 1997;Smith et al, 1996;Van Dijk et al, 2006]. Each item presented an emotion, and participants were asked to rate how well this emotion reflected their feelings at that particular moment on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely).…”
Section: Experimental Setting and Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the emotions evoked by each trial, the participants completed a computerized questionnaire (see Table I) including 18 items, of which 13 were adapted from the depression adjective checklist (DACL) [Lubin, 1981] and from previous studies assessing fortune of others emotions [Brigham, 1997;Smith et al, 1996;Van Dijk et al, 2006]. Each item presented an emotion, and participants were asked to rate how well this emotion reflected their feelings at that particular moment on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely).…”
Section: Experimental Setting and Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The onedimensional scale used in our research shows a satisfactory reliability (alpha 0.79). A third measure, used to operationalize the concept of psychological well-being, was a Dutch variant of a composite of two subscales of the Depression Adjective Check List (Lubin 1965(Lubin , 1981Arrindell and van Rooijen 1999) measuring dysphoria (22 items) and euphoria (12 items). The respondent is asked to cross out those affects that give expression to his momentary emotional feelings.…”
Section: Research Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the correlations for test-retest reliability, as expected, are the lowest of any in the table, although significant because of the large N . The state form of the DACL was used, and these correlations should be sensitive to transient mood change (Lubin & Himelstein, 1976 Table 2 presents findings on the concurrent validity of the four versions of the DACL. Both the DACL and the self-rating scale are measures of self-reported state depression, and, as expected, the highest correlations are between these two measures on all versions of the DACL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%