Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS® (9th edition) guideline

Şaşmaz, Muhammed İkbal; Akça, Ali Haydar

doi:10.1007/s00068-017-0803-9

Cited by 15 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The present study showed that videos on resuscitation that were uploaded by national and international associations were viewed more often than those uploaded by unidentified sources. Similar results were reported by Sasmaz et al [4], based on their research on trauma management videos, and by Yaylaci et al [11], based on two trials examining CPR videos. The greater number of views for videos uploaded by official medical organizations compared with those uploaded by other sources suggests a greater level of trust in these associations.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…The average total score of the videos uploaded by official medical organizations (6.43 ± 3.57) was significantly higher than that of videos uploaded by unidentified sources (4.24 ± 2.39), consistent with previous reports [4, 9, 11]. With regard to information related to topics that directly affect human life, such as CPR, materials published by institutions that are constantly working in this field are more reliable.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

“…About 88% of the videos assessed in this study were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Similarly, several previous studies examining the reliability of YouTube videos reported exclusion of 80%–94% of videos [4, 9, 11, 13]. As in these previous studies, we found that the high exclusion rate made it difficult to find the required content on YouTube.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

“…The increasing integration of the Internet and social media into medical education suggests that online medical training will form the basis of future medical education [3]. In addition to patients and laypeople, increasing numbers of medical students and health professionals use the Internet and social media to obtain information about their areas of specialization [4]. Used for video sharing, YouTube is not only the most popular social networking site, but also the largest video search engine on the Internet [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to patients and laypeople, increasing numbers of medical students and health professionals use the Internet and social media to obtain information about their areas of specialization [4]. Used for video sharing, YouTube is not only the most popular social networking site, but also the largest video search engine on the Internet [4]. The website, established in 2005, provides users with the ability to upload, share, view, and download video clips via a simple, integrated platform [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Videos in English on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA Resuscitation Guidelines

Katipoğlu

Akbaş

Koçak

et al. 2019

Emergency Medicine International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decade, YouTube has become one of the largest online resources for medical information. However, uploaded videos are published without any peer review or quality control, so incorrect and incomplete information can be easily disseminated via the virtual platform and can be perceived as correct. The YouTube website was searched for videos in English uploaded between 15 October 2015 and 21 October 2016 using the following keywords: “CPR,” “cardiopulmonary resuscitation,” and “basic life support.” This study had a cross-sectional analytical design. In the first evaluation, the accuracy of the videos was checked according to the information contained in the basic cardiac life support algorithm. In the second evaluation, we assessed whether advanced-level, innovative medical information was included in these videos; when included, the accuracy of such information was checked. Of 774 videos evaluated, 92 videos were included in the study after application of the exclusion criteria. The videos were scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 20 points. The mean total score, based on all criteria, was 4.79 ± 2.88. The highest mean total score was achieved by videos uploaded by official medical organizations (6.43 ± 3.57), followed by those uploaded by health professionals and organizations (4.25 ± 2.49), and those uploaded by unidentified sources. YouTube videos are insufficient in providing information about the basic life support algorithm and advanced-level information according to the 2015 AHA resuscitation guidelines for health professionals. The educational material published by health institutions that are constantly working in the area is a more reliable source of information on subjects that directly affect human life, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Videos in English on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA Resuscitation Guidelines

Katipoğlu

Akbaş

Koçak

et al. 2019

Emergency Medicine International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Entwicklung und Validierung einer Checkliste zur Bewertung von Videos zum Erlernen von Reanimationsmaßnahmen

Sterz

Tückmantel

Bepler

et al. 2021

Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Gut durchgeführte Wiederbelebungsmaßnahmen können bei einem Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand das Outcome verbessern. Um praktische Fähigkeiten zu erlernen, greifen Medizinstudierende oft auf Lehrvideos zurück. Studien zeigen jedoch häufig eine unzureichende Qualität der im Internet zur Verfügung gestellten Videos zu Reanimationsmaßnahmen. Eine Bewertung anhand einer validierten, auf den aktuellen „guidelines“ basierten Checkliste fehlt bisher. Ziel der Arbeit Entwicklung und Validierung einer Checkliste zur Bewertung von Lehrvideos zur Reanimation. Material und Methoden In einem Expertenworkshop erfolgte basierend auf den aktuellen „guidelines“ die Formulierung der Checklistenitems. Die Checkliste wurde in einem vierstufigen Reviewprozess von Notärzten getestet. Die Bewertungen wurden analysiert und die Items angepasst und spezifiziert. Nach dem Reviewprozess wurde die Checkliste an 74 Videos zur Reanimation angewendet. Ergebnisse Die Checkliste umfasst 25 Items in vier Kategorien (initiale Maßnahmen, Thoraxkompression, AED-Nutzung, Atmung), die auf einer 3‑stufigen Likert-Skala bewertet werden. 16 NotärztInnen nahmen an der Studie teil. Sie bewerteten jeweils durchschnittlich 9,3 ± 5,7 Videos. Die Reviewer stimmten in 65,1 ± 12,6 % der Fälle überein. Die höchsten Übereinstimmungen wurden im Unterthema AED erzielt, das Item „Beim Schock Patienten nicht berühren“ wies die höchste Übereinstimmung auf. Die Items der Kategorie Thoraxkompression wurden am häufigsten unterschiedlich bewertet. Diskussion Es konnte erstmalig für den deutschsprachigen Raum eine Checkliste zur Bewertung von Lehrvideos zur Reanimation erstellt und validiert werden.

show abstract

YouTube as an Educational Resource in Medical Education: a Scoping Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS® (9th edition) guideline

Cited by 15 publications

References 17 publications

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Videos in English on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA Resuscitation Guidelines

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Videos in English on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA Resuscitation Guidelines

Entwicklung und Validierung einer Checkliste zur Bewertung von Videos zum Erlernen von Reanimationsmaßnahmen

YouTube as an Educational Resource in Medical Education: a Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About