2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2336836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable Facility Location Design Under Uncertain Correlated Disruptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we define three commonly-used representations of generally correlated disruption profiles (i.e., with scenario probabilities, marginal probabilities and conditional probabilities) and derive transformations between them. These transformations unify different representations that have appeared in past studies (Liu et al, 2009;Lu et al, 2015;Li and Ouyang, 2010) and theoretically prove their equivalence. Second, we provide detailed formulas to transform these probabilistic correlation profiles into an adapted supporting station structure.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…First, we define three commonly-used representations of generally correlated disruption profiles (i.e., with scenario probabilities, marginal probabilities and conditional probabilities) and derive transformations between them. These transformations unify different representations that have appeared in past studies (Liu et al, 2009;Lu et al, 2015;Li and Ouyang, 2010) and theoretically prove their equivalence. Second, we provide detailed formulas to transform these probabilistic correlation profiles into an adapted supporting station structure.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Second, Theorem 4 extends the framework studied by Lu et al. () in the context of facility location, showing how the DRO approach can be applied when sources of disruption risks can be partitioned into groups.…”
Section: Hybrid Heuristic Modelmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Lu et al. () apply DRO in the context of facility location, where the disruption risks among the set of candidate facility locations are correlated. Due to the supermodularity of their objective function, they can obtain an explicit form of the worst‐case joint distribution for their problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step (5): Update the value of Γ i via the equation (38). Then, come back to Step (2) and figure out the Lagrangian problem with new Lagrangian coefficients.…”
Section: Step (2): Figure Out the Lagrangian Problem With The Lagrangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shishebori and Yousefi-Babadi [37] studied a reliable and robust health care station location ND problem, which simultaneously takes an investment budget constraint, system disruptions, and uncertain parameters into account. Lu et al [38] formulated a reliable facility location design in which allows disruptions at different locations to be correlated with an uncertain joint distribution. They applied distributionally robust optimization to minimize the expected cost under the worst-case distribution with predetermined marginal disruption probabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%