2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable Patch Trackers: Robust visual tracking by exploiting reliable patches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
198
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
198
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the linear regression commonly used to learn DCFs, Henriques et al (2015) apply a kernel regression and propose its multi-channel extension to enable to the use of features such as HOG Dalal and Triggs (2005). Li et al (2015b) propose a new use for particle filters in order to choose reliables patches to consider part of the object. These patches are modelled using a variant of the method proposed by Henriques et al (2015).…”
Section: Model Free Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the linear regression commonly used to learn DCFs, Henriques et al (2015) apply a kernel regression and propose its multi-channel extension to enable to the use of features such as HOG Dalal and Triggs (2005). Li et al (2015b) propose a new use for particle filters in order to choose reliables patches to consider part of the object. These patches are modelled using a variant of the method proposed by Henriques et al (2015).…”
Section: Model Free Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPOT (Zhang and van der Maaten 2014) is a strong performing part based tracker, CMT (Nebehay and Pflugfelder 2015) is a strong performing keypoint based tracker, LRST (Zhang et al 2014d) and ORIA (Wu et al 2012) are recent generative trackers. RPT (Li et al 2015b) is a recently proposed technique that reported state-of-the-art results on the Online Object Tracking benchmark . TLD (Kalal et al 2012), MIL (Babenko et al 2011), FCT (Zhang et al 2014c), DF (Sevilla-Lara and Learned-Miller 2012) and IVT (Ross et al 2008) were included as baseline tracking methods with publicly available implementations.…”
Section: Model Free Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an efficient tracking algorithm [7] based on compressive sensing theory is proposed. Correlation filter has been widely used in object tracking area with good performance and high speed [38][39][40][41][42] . Henriques et al [41] introduce a fast tracking algorithm, which exploits the circular structure of the kernel matrix that can be efficiently computed by the fast fourier transform algorithm.…”
Section: Tracking-by-detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henriques et al [41] introduce a fast tracking algorithm, which exploits the circular structure of the kernel matrix that can be efficiently computed by the fast fourier transform algorithm. Li et al [42] propose reliable patch trackers (RPT), which attempts to identify and exploits the reliable patches that can be tracked effectively through the whole tracking process. Based on the framework of correlation filter tracker and Bayesian inference, Liu et al [43] develop a real-time part-based tracker by using adaptive weighing, updating and structure masking method.…”
Section: Tracking-by-detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our approach with 11 state-of-the-art trackers: CN [9], CSK [3], DSST [6], KCF [4], PCOM [10], RPT [11], SAMF [12], SRDCF [13], STC [14], Struck [15] and TGPR [16]. For fair evaluations, all the trackers are tested under the same experimental conditions.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%